期刊文献+

锐针绳梯穿刺法和钝针扣眼穿刺法在血液透析动静脉内瘘中的应用效果 被引量:2

Application effect of sharp needle rope ladder puncture method and blunt needle buttonhole puncture method in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究锐针绳梯穿刺法和钝针扣眼穿刺法在血液透析动静脉内瘘中的应用效果。方法选取2016年6月至2018年8月于本院血液透析中心实施动静脉内瘘维持性血液透析治疗方式的120例患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组与观察组,每组60例。观察组实施钝针扣眼穿刺法,对照组实施锐针绳梯穿刺法,比较两组内瘘血流量、穿刺成功率、渗血率、感染率、疼痛程度、穿刺满意率。结果观察组内瘘血流量大于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组穿刺成功率为98.9%,高于对照组的87.0%,渗血率为3.4%,低于对照组的16.8%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组感染率比较差异无统计学意义。观察组疼痛程度轻于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组穿刺满意率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论钝针扣眼穿刺法可有效提升成功率,降低渗血率、疼痛感和感染率,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To explore the application effect of sharp needle rope ladder puncture method and blunt needle buttonhole puncture method in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula.Methods 120 patients who underwent arteriovenous atrophy maintenance hemodialysis treatment in the hemodialysis center of our hospital from June 2016 to August 2018 were selected as the research subjects,and they were randomly divided into control group and study group,with 60 cases in each group.The study group was performed with blunt needle buttonhole puncture,while the control group was performed with sharp needle rope ladder puncture method,the blood flow of the internal fistula,puncture success rate,oozing rate,infection rate,pain degree,and puncture satisfaction rate between the two groups were compared.Results The blood flow of the internal fistula in the study group was greater than that in the control group(P<0.05).The puncture success rate in the study group was 98.9%,which was higher than 87.0%in the control group,and the bleeding rate was 3.4%,which was lower than 16.8%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistical significance difference in the infection rate between the two groups.The pain degree in the study group was lighter than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The puncture satisfaction rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The blunt needle buttonhole puncture can effectively improve the success rate,reduce the bleeding rate,pain and infection rate,and is worthy of clinical application.
作者 熊渝英 柳助岚 马婷 邓燕芳 胡应红 XIONG Yuying;LIU Zhulan;MA Ting;DENG Yanfang;HU Yinghong(Department of Hemodialysis,Jianli Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jingzhou,Hubei,433300,China)
出处 《当代医学》 2022年第24期83-86,共4页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 血液透析 动静脉内瘘 穿刺法 Hemodialysis Arteriovenous fistula Puncture
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献91

  • 1张倩,张丽红,王保兴.自体动静脉内瘘的物理检查[J].中国血液净化,2012,11(3):153-156. 被引量:25
  • 2林惠风.实用血液净化护理[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005:149. 被引量:74
  • 3Connelly M, Neville K. Comparative Prospective Evaluation of the Responsiveness of Single-Item Pediatric Pain-Intensity Self-Report Scales and Their Uniqueness From Negative Affect in a Hospital Setting. Pain, 2010,11:1451 - 1460. 被引量:1
  • 4Zhou Y, Petpichetchian W, Kitrungrote L. Psychometric properties of pain intensity scales comparing among postoperative adult patients, elderly patients without and with mild cognitive impairment in China. Int J Nurs Stud, 2011, 48:449 - 457. 被引量:1
  • 5Chien CW, Bagraith KS, Khan A, et al. Comparative responsiveness of verbal and numerical rating scales to measure pain intensity in patients with chronic pain. J Pain, 2013,14:1653 - 1662. 被引量:1
  • 6Dworkin RH, Turk DC ,Peiree-Sandner S, et al. Consi- derations for improving assay sensitivity in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain, 2012. 153: 1148-11581. 被引量:1
  • 7林英.骨科术后疼痛量化评估的比较研究[A】;第21届中国康协肢残康复学术年会暨第二届“泰山杯”全国骨科青年科技创新论坛论文集,2012. 被引量:1
  • 8Portenoy R. Development and testing of a neuropathic pain screening questionnaire: ID Pain. Curr MedRes Opin, 2006, 22:1555 - 1565. 被引量:1
  • 9Bennett M .The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assess- ment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain, 2001, 92:147 - 157. 被引量:1
  • 10L. Jett, S. Spruill, I. Pike, et al. Correlation of numreric rating scale (NRS), neuropathic pain questionnaire and keywords in study for treating neuropathic pain with KRN5500. European Journal of Pain Supplements, 2010, 4:125 - 126. 被引量:1

共引文献393

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部