期刊文献+

经直肠超声造影和彩色多普勒超声用于直肠癌与直肠间质瘤鉴别诊断的价值对比分析 被引量:1

Comparison on the Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Color Dopple Ultrasound in Differentially Diagnosing Rectal Cancer from Rectal Stromal
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较经直肠超声造影(CEUS)和彩色多普勒超声(CDU)用于直肠癌与直肠间质瘤鉴别诊断的价值。方法:随机抽取2019年9月至2020年9月于我院接受手术治疗且术前行CEUS和CDU检查的直肠癌或直肠间质瘤患者各40例,比较直肠癌与直肠间质瘤患者CEUS、CDU检查参数的差异,以及两种检查方法对直肠癌和直肠间质瘤的诊断准确率。结果:1)CDU检查参数:直肠癌组患者病灶包绕肠腔率、病灶内部回声均匀率、阻力指数、血流峰值流速均显著高于直肠间质瘤组,P<0.05。2)CEUS检查参数:直肠癌组患者峰值强度(Imax)明显高于直肠间质瘤组,而上升时间(RT)、达峰时间(TTP)、平均渡越时间(mTT)明显低于直肠间质瘤组,P<0.05。3)诊断准确率:CEUS诊断直肠癌及直肠间质瘤的准确率(96.25%)明显高于CDU(81.25%),P<0.05。结论:CEUS和CDU用于鉴别诊断直肠癌与直肠间质瘤均具有一定价值,但两种检查方式相比,CEUS效果更好。 Objective To compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)and color Dopple ultrasound(CDU)in differentially diagnosing rectal cancer from rectal stromal. Methods Randomly enrolled rectal cancer patients(40cases)and rectal stromal patients(40cases)who all received surgery(2019-09-2020-09)in author’s hospital,and preoperative CEUS and CDU inspection;then,compared both group’patients’ difference between CEUS parameter and CDU one,as well as diagnostic accuracy rate of both inspections on rectal cancer and rectal stromal. Results 1)CDU parameters inspected:in the rate of bowel cavity encysted,echophony smooth rate,resistance index,and flow peak velocity the patients with rectal cancer were all significantly higher than the patients with rectal stromal(P<0.05);2)CEUS parameters inspected:in Imax.the patients with rectal cancer were significantly higher than the patients with rectal stromal(P<0.05),and its RT,TTP,and mTT lower than the latter(P<0.05);3)Accuracy rate:the accuracy rate of CEUS in diagnosing both diseases was significantly higher than CDU’s one(96.25% vs81.25%,P<0.05). Conclusion In differentially diagnosing both diseases both inspections have certain value,only CEUS is better than CDU.
作者 邓璇 DENG Xuan(Tanghe County's Peoples Hospital,Tanghe,Henan 473400)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2022年第5期23-25,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 直肠癌 直肠间质瘤 彩色多普勒超声 直肠超声造影 鉴别诊断 影像学特征 Rectal cancer Rectal stromal Color Dopple ultrasound Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Differential diagnosis Image feature
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1Zhou X, Yan F, Luo Y,et al. Characterization and diagnosticconfidence of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for solid renal tumors.Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011,37(6):845-853. 被引量:1
  • 2Houtzager S, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette JJ, et al. Evaluation ofrenal masses with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Curr Urol Rep,2013,14(2):116-123. 被引量:1
  • 3Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts.Radiology, 1986,158( 1) : 1-10. 被引量:1
  • 4Katabathina V, Garg D, Prasad SR, et al. Cystic renal neo-plasms and renal neoplasms associated with cystic renal diseases inadults: Cross-sectional imaging findings. J Comput Assist To-mogr, 2012,36(6):659-668. 被引量:1
  • 5El-Mokadem I, Budak M, Pillai S, et al. Progression, interob-server agreement, and malignancy rate in complex renal cystsBosniak category [I F). Urol oncol, 2014’32( 1) : 24. e21-24. e27. 被引量:1
  • 6Park BK,Kim B, Kim SH,et al. Assessment of cystic renalmasses based on Bosniak classification : Comparison of CT andcontrast-enhanced US. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 61(2) :310-314. 被引量:1
  • 7Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. GLOBOCAN 2008, cancer in- cidence and mortality worldwide: IARC cancerbase No. 10. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 8Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, et al. Guidelines and good clin- ical practice recommendat-ions for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)--update: 2008. Ultraschall Med, 2008,29(1) :28-44. 被引量:1
  • 9Piscaglia F, Nolsee C, Dietrich CF, et al. The EFSUMB guide- lines and Recommendations on the clinical practice of Contrast En- hanced Ultrasound (CEUS) : Update 2011 on non-hepatic applica- tions. Ultraschall Med~ 2012,33(1):33-59. 被引量:1
  • 10Folkman J. Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med, 1995,1(1) :27-31. 被引量:1

共引文献72

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部