期刊文献+

胫骨近端外侧锁定接骨板排筏螺钉联合Jail螺钉治疗胫骨平台外侧塌陷骨折 被引量:4

Proximal tibial lateral locking plate with rafting screws combined with Jail screws in the treatment of collapse fracture of the lateral tibial plateau
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胫骨近端外侧锁定接骨板排筏螺钉联合Jail螺钉治疗胫骨平台外侧塌陷骨折的疗效。方法采用回顾性病例系列研究分析2016年1月至2020年1月南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁医院收治的36例胫骨平台外侧塌陷骨折患者的临床资料,其中男19例,女17例;年龄34~68岁[(48.6±5.8)岁]。Schatzker分型:Ⅱ型28例,Ⅲ型8例。患者均采用胫骨近端外侧锁定接骨板排筏螺钉联合Jail螺钉固定治疗。记录手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合情况。比较术前、术后2 d及1年胫骨平台关节面塌陷距离、胫骨平台后倾角(PSA)、胫骨平台内翻角(TPVA)及Rasmussen解剖评分。术后2 d及1年采用美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分评价膝关节功能。观察并发症情况。结果患者均获随访12~32个月[(19.5±3.1)个月]。手术时间为56~82 min[(68.5±9.1)min]。术中出血量为40~100 ml[(75.6±10.2)ml]。骨折均Ⅰ期临床愈合,愈合时间为8~15周[(12.5±1.3)周]。胫骨平台关节面塌陷距离由术前(15.5±4.2)mm恢复至术后2 d及1年的(0.7±0.3)mm、(1.0±0.2)mm(P均<0.01);PSA由术前(21.2±2.1)°恢复至术后2 d及1年的(8.9±0.8)°、(9.2±0.6)°(P均<0.01);TPVA由术前(100.2±3.7)°恢复至术后2 d及1年的(88.9±1.8)°、(87.2±1.6)°(P均<0.05);Rasmussen解剖评分由术前(7.8±1.8)分恢复至术后2 d及1年的(17.1±0.9)分、(16.3±0.7)分(P均<0.01)。与术后2 d比较,术后1年胫骨平台关节面塌陷距离、PSA、TPVA及Rasmussen解剖评分差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。术后1年HSS评分为(92.8±3.2)分,明显高于术后2 d的(74.8±3.5)分(P<0.01)。术后2例出现伤口浅表感染,经清创换药后愈合,无深部感染发生。结论胫骨近端外侧锁定接骨板排筏螺钉联合Jail螺钉治疗胫骨平台外侧塌陷骨折,可有效防止关节面继发性塌陷,骨折解剖复位满意,膝关节功能恢复好,术后并发症少。 Objective To explore the efficacy of the proximal tibial lateral locking plate with rafting screws combined with Jail screws in the treatment of collapse fracture of the lateral tibial plateau.Methods A retrospective case series study was performed on clinical data of 36 patients with collapse fracture of the lateral tibial plateau admitted to Suqian Hospital of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group from January 2016 to January 2020,including 19 males and 17 females,aged 34-68 years[(48.6±5.8)years].Schatzker classification was type II in 28 patients and type III in 8 patients.All patients were treated using the proximal tibial lateral locking plate with raft screws combined with Jail screws.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing were detected.The distance of articular surface collapse of the tibial plateau,posterior inclination angle(PSA)of the tibial plateau,tibial plateau varus angle(TPVA)and Rasmussen anatomical score were compared before operation and at day 2 and 1 year after operation.The Hospital for Special Surgery(HSS)score was used to evaluate knee function at day 2 and 1 year after operation.Complications were also recorded.Results All patients were followed up for 12-32 months[(19.5±3.1)months].The operation time was 56-82 minutes[(68.5±9.1)minutes].The intraoperative blood loss was 40-100 ml[(75.6±10.2)ml].The fracture was clinically healed by first-stage,with the healing time of 8 to 15 weeks[(12.5±1.3)weeks].The distance of articular surface collapse of the tibial plateau was improved from(15.5±4.2)mm before operation to(0.7±0.3)mm at day 2 after operation and(1.0±0.2)mm at 1 year after operation(all P<0.01).The PSA was improved from(21.2±2.1)°before operation to(8.9±0.8)°at day 2 after operation and(9.2±0.6)°at 1 year after operation(all P<0.01).The TPA was improved from(100.2±3.7)°before operation to(88.9±1.8)°at day 2 after operation and(87.2±1.6)°at 1 year after operation(all P<0.05).The Rasmussen anatomical score changed from(7.8±1.8)points before o
作者 孔祥如 杨春 单宇宙 孙健宁 姜伟 杨太明 朱裕成 Kong Xiangru;Yang Chun;Shan Yuzhou;Sun Jianning;Jiang Wei;Yang Taiming;Zhu Yucheng(Department of Orthopedics,Suqian Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University,Suqian Hospital of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group,Suqian 223800,China)
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第6期510-516,共7页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
关键词 胫骨骨折 骨折固定术 锁定钢板 Tibial fractures Fracture fixation,internal Locking plate
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献87

  • 1宋文奇,陆男吉,罗从风,于晓雯,张长青,曾炳芳.胫骨平台骨折伴软组织损伤的临床分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(10):1102-1104. 被引量:27
  • 2王凯,车彪,邹凯,刘俊,覃松.胫骨平台骨折手术疗效影响因素的探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(2):98-100. 被引量:35
  • 3Rasmussen PS. Tibial condylar fractures. Impairment of knee joint stability as an indication for surgical treatrrent[J]. J lime Joint Surg Am,1973, 55(7): 1331- 1350. 被引量:1
  • 4Kenneth AE. Split depression posterolateral tibial plateau fracture: direct open reduction and internal fixation[J].Tech Knee Surg, 2005, 4(4) :257-263. 被引量:1
  • 5Asano T. Akagi M. Nakamura T. The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique[J]. J Arthroplasty,2005,20(8):1060-1067. 被引量:1
  • 6Schatzker J. Fractures of the tibial plateau[A]. In: Schatzker J. Tile M eds. The Rationale of Operative Fracture Care[M]. Berlin: Springer- Verlag. 1988: 279. 被引量:1
  • 7Marsh JL. Slongo TF. Agel J, et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: orthopaedic trauma association classification. database and outcomes committee[J].J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(Suppl 10) :S1-S163. 被引量:1
  • 8Khan RM, Khan SH, Ahmad AJ, et al. TibM plateau fractures. A new classification scherne[J].Clin Orthop Relal Res, 2000, 375:231-242. 被引量:1
  • 9Gicquel T, Najihi N, Huten D, et al. Tibial plateau fractures: reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker , AO,Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013, 99(7) :805-816. 被引量:1
  • 10Luo CF, Sun H,Zhang B, et al. Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau Iractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2010,24(1) :6R3-692. 被引量:1

共引文献172

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部