摘要
非同质化通证可与链外特定数字艺术品形成一一对应的映射关系,为之提供权利凭证。非同质化通证的价值来源包括所映射的特定数字资产,也包括自身独立价值,应作为网络虚拟财产纳入物权保护范围。实践中非同质化通证面临“铸造权”缺乏制约、去中心化存储的悖论及碎片化等法治困境。作为应对方案,机构上线非同质化通证前应承担审查其来源合法性的义务,发生侵权纠纷后可采用“基于区块链的纠纷解决机制”;中心化存储可以向多中心存储机制转换,对境外公有链采取完全去中心化的存储机制,事先引入区块链安全公司审计,设置黑名单制度及全网信息通报机制;监管机构打击本领域“标准化合约交易”、非法资产证券化等违规行为。
The non-fungible token can form a one-to-one mapping relationship with specific digital artworks outside the chain to provide the certificate of authority. The value source of the non-fungible token includes the mapped specific digital assets, as well as its own independent value, which should be included in the scope of property protection as a network virtual property. In practice, the non-fungible token is faced with many legal difficulties. As a response plan, the institution shall undertake the obligation to review the legitimacy of its source before launching the non-fungible token.
作者
邓建鹏
李嘉宁
Deng Jianpeng;Li Jianing
出处
《探索与争鸣》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期87-95,178,共10页
Exploration and Free Views
基金
中央财经大学新兴交叉学科建设项目“金融系统安全与区块链监管科技”(202103)。
关键词
非同质化通证
权利凭证
数字艺术品
权利困境
区块链
non-fungible token
certificate of authority
digital artwork
right dilemma
blockchain
