摘要
从当前司法解释的规定看,行为数额、次数、对象等行为要素是情节犯情节要件中常见的解释内容。那种质疑行为数额、次数、对象要素正当性的观点,可能存在一定程度的误读。其中,数额、次数、对象在不同情节犯罪名中又呈现不同的解释类型,通过对这些解释类型的梳理,发现部分数额规定存在不能准确反映行为的社会危害性,用语表述不一、谦抑过度的问题,部分次数规定存在不明确、不准确、标准不清楚的问题,部分对象规定存在定性把握不清、内部逻辑冲突的问题。建议秉持适当划定犯罪圈、尽量实现明确性、全面而不重复评价等原则,有针对性地予以完善。
According to the current provisions of judicial interpretation,amount,frequency and object are the common contents of explanation in the plot elements of plot crimes.There may be a certain degree of misreading in the view of questioning the legitimacy of the amount,frequency and object elements.Among them,amount,frequency and object present different types of explanation in different names of plot crimes.Through sorting out these types of judicial interpretation,it is found that part of the provisions on the amount cannot accurately reflect the social harm of the behavior,and the expressions are inconsistent and excessive modesty.It is also found that some provisions on the frequency are not clear,accurate,and the standard is not clear,and some provisions on the object have unclear grasp of the application of charges and internal logic conflicts.It is suggested that the crime circle should be properly demarcated,as far as possible to achieve clarity and comprehensive evaluation without repeated evaluation.
作者
张庆立
ZHANG Qingli(School of Criminal Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China;Shanghai Songjiang District People's Procuratorate, Shanghai 201620, China)
出处
《信阳师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2022年第4期11-18,共8页
Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
最高人民检察院检察应用理论研究经费资助课题(GJ2020A66)。
关键词
情节犯
情节要件
行为数额
行为次数
行为对象
plot crime
plot condition
amount elements
frequency elements
object elements
