摘要
为了提高文学小说的地位,冯梦龙将小说与诗、赋、释、道等相提并论,以同经、史等大道相对应的方式强调小说之“小”。《四库全书总目》则强调小说之“说”,并以文学小说不符合目录学体例要求为由将其驱赶出小说的范畴,但《四库全书总目》中采集的小说体例照样不统一,所以在给目录学小说分类的过程中还是以小说之“小”为依据。文学小说重视小说的审美价值,而目录学小说则重视小说的社会功能,以强调文学小说的社会功能为由争得一席之地结果是徒劳的,明确提出文学小说的审美特征,强调文学小说与目录学小说截然不同才是正道。
In order to enhance the status of fiction,Feng Menglong equated fiction with poems,fu,Buddhism and Taoism,and emphasized the“smallness”of fiction in a way corresponding to the grandness of classics and history.The General Catalog of The Complete Library of the Four Treasuries emphasizes the“talking”of fiction,and expunges literary fiction from the category of fiction on the grounds that it does not meet the requirements of its bibliographic style.However,the styles of fiction collected in the General Catalog were still not unified,so the classification of bibliographic fiction is still based on its“smallness”.Literary fiction attaches great importance to aesthetic value,while bibliographic fiction values its social function.It is futile to strive for a place for fiction on the grounds of its social function.The right way is to clearly put forward the aesthetic characteristics of fiction and emphasize that literary fiction is completely different from bibliographic fiction.
出处
《五邑大学学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第3期36-39,93,共5页
Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
目录学
文学
说理
虚构
Bibliography
Literature
Reasoning
Fiction
