摘要
近年来,美欧贸易救济措施频频与第三国发生牵连。欧盟在反补贴调查中将第三国政府给予本国投资者的财政资助视为东道国的国家行为;美国在反倾销调查中将第三国原材料价格“偏低”作为“特殊市场情形”的认定事由,事实上赋予被调查国维护本国“完美”竞争市场的义务。上述做法直接违反了当前补贴规则对补贴主体的认定方式,也与反倾销规则中“适当比较”要件直接冲突。此种现象的成因在于,在全球产业链分工到价值链分工的过程中,现行贸易规则无法满足美欧利益需求,且美欧并无重新构建规则的能力。对此,我国需澄清国家责任的构成要件,以免此问题对国家主权与“一带一路”倡议实施形成阻碍。我国有必要在现行规则体系下强调“适当比较”规则的重要作用,但不宜引领新规则的制定。
In recent years,the US and EU trade remedy measures frequently inculpate with third countries.EU’s CVD investigations regard financial contributions of home countries to their investors as actions of host countries.the US antidumping investigations consider underpriced raw materials from third countries a contribution to Particular Market Situation and de facto impose upon the countries under investigation the obligation to maintain a perfect competing market.This directly goes against the determination of“government”under current CVD rules and contradicts anti-dumping rules concerning“proper comparison”.This is because during the evolution from industrial chain to value chains,both the US and EU find current trade rules unsatisfactory for their national interests.They also lack the capacity to impose new rules.China ought to clarify the components for state responsibility so that it would not impede China’s sovereignty or the Belt and Road Initiative.Moreover,while it is advisable to emphasize upon the Proper Comparison rule,time is not yet ripe for China to lead the draft of new rules.
出处
《国际商务研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第4期74-85,共12页
International Business Research
基金
教育部社科基金后期资助项目“贸易救济措施中被调查国的政策空间研究”(项目编号:21JHQ071)。
关键词
补贴
财政资助
特殊市场情形
国家责任
subsidy
financial contribution
particular market situation
state responsibility