摘要
20世纪初,胡适借助毛子水“整理国故”的主张号召学术界要用“批判的态度”和“科学的精神”对于我国古代历史文献遗产进行重新整理。余绍宋有感于画学书籍的整理刻不容缓,遂先后编撰《画法要录》与《书画书录解题》二书,首以科学方法对于古代书画典籍进行分类编排。四十年代,俞剑华借“整理国故”之名创“消极之整理”与“积极之建设”相结合的研究方法并在余氏分类体系的基础上再次对于古代画籍的分类进行了调整。80年代,温肇桐辅以目录学方法对于前述分类体系修改之后提出了更为简明的分类方法。通过对于三种分类方法的比较研究,可以明晰前辈学者在提升古典画学文献的学术价值与实用价值方面所做的不懈努力,在一定程度上实现了“类例既分,学术自明”的研究目标。
At the beginning of the 20th centur y,following Mao Zishui’s proposal of“Collating National Heritage”,Hu Shi called on the academic circles to rearrange the heritage of China’s historical documents with a“critical attitude”and“scientific spirit”.Yu Shaosong felt that the arrangement of painting books was urgent,so he compiled two books,Records of Painting Methods and Answers to Calligraphyand Painting Problems,and first classified and arranged ancient calligraphy and painting classics with scientific methods.In the 1940s,Yu Jianhua created the research method of combining“negative collation”and“positive construction”in the name of“collating national heritage”,and adjusted the classification of ancient painting books again on the basis of Yu’s classification system.In the 1980s,Wen Zhaotong proposed a more concise classification method after modifying the above classification systems with the help of bibliography.Through the comparative study of the three classification methods,we can clarify the unremitting efforts made by previous scholars in improving the academic and practical value of classical painting literature,and realize“the academic self-evident classification”to a certain extent.
出处
《南京艺术学院学报（美术与设计）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第3期36-41,I0002,共7页
Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute:Fine Arts & Design
基金
2021年度国家社科基金艺术学项目“中国古典书画目录研究”(21BF092)阶段性成果
2019年度江苏省社科基金艺术学一般项目“整理国故与中国美术文献专科目录的现代转型研究”(19YSB007)阶段性成果。
关键词
余绍宋
俞剑华
温肇桐
画籍
分类
Yu Shaosong
Yu Jianhua
Wen Zhaotong
classification of painting-books
