摘要
出自崇祯本文天祥文集的《瑞山康氏族谱序》,从其内容分析应是出自明人的伪托。此谱中关于康氏家族始迁祖的历史追述,正统前后出现变化,并增加了文天祥撰写该篇序言的内容。万历时期康氏家族成员通过约请泰和当地文人撰写谱牒序跋,逐步确立文天祥序言的可靠性,并致使其在崇祯时期被编入文天祥文集,成为康氏家族历史叙述的重要依据。
The“Preface to the Genealogical Record of the Kang Clan from Ruishan”from the Selected Collection of Wen Tianxiang of the Chongzhen period seems to be a forgery from the Ming Dynasty by analyzing its content. In thisgenealogical record, the historical narratives on the ancestors of the Kang clanstarted changing during the Zhengtong period and added the content on thepreface by Wen Tianxiang. Then in the Wanli period, the members of the Kangclan invited local literati from Taihe to write prefaces and postscripts, so theyattempted to verify the preface of Wen Tianxiang. Eventually, Wen’s preface wasincorporated into the Completed Collection of Wen Tianxiang in the Chongzhenperiod, which became the crucial evidence of the historical narratives of the Kangclan.
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“宋写本《仙源类谱》《宗藩庆系录》整理与研究”(17AZS018)阶段性成果。
关键词
文天祥
文集谱序
族谱
Wen Tianxiang
Collection,Preface to the Genealogical Record
Genealogical Record
