期刊文献+

社会价值取向影响合作公平评价的ERP研究

Social Value Orientations Influence Fair Evaluation in Cooperation:An ERP Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨社会价值取向和贡献情境对分配的公平评价的影响。方法:通过三优势测量问卷共筛选44名大学生被试(n_(亲社会)=24,n_(亲自我)=20),采用2(社会价值取向:亲社会,亲自我)×2(贡献情境:贡献大,贡献小)×2(分配:按贡献分配,平均分配)的混合实验设计,利用事件相关电位技术考察社会价值取向和贡献情境对分配方案公平评价时FRN和P3的影响。结果:在贡献大情境,平均分配比按贡献分配诱发更大的FRN;在贡献小情境,按贡献分配比平均分配诱发更大的FRN。按贡献分配诱发亲社会个体更大的P3;在贡献大时,按贡献分配诱发亲自我个体更大的P3;贡献小时,平均分配诱发亲自我个体更大的P3。结论:社会价值取向调节个体对分配结果的晚期公平评价。 Objective:To explore the effect of social value orientation on the fair evaluation of cooperation distribution.Methods:Forty-four college students were grouped through the Triple-Dominance Measure(n_(prosocials)=24,n_(proselfs)=20),a 2(social value orientation:prosocials,proselfs) × 2(contribution context:more contribution,less contribution) × 2(distribution:based on contribution distribution,equally distribution) mixed experiment design was conducted using eventrelated potentials technique,with the purpose of exploring how social value orientation and contribution context impact FRN and P3 of fair evaluation.Results:In the early stage,under more contribution context,based on equality distribution elicited larger amplitude in FRN than the distribution based on contribution;while under less contribution context,based on contribution distribution elicited larger FRN than the distribution based on equality.In the late stage,contribution distribution induced larger P3 between prosocials;contribution distribution under more contribution and equally distribution under less contribution induced larger P3 between proselfs.Conclusion:Social value orientation modulates P3 stage of fair evaluation of cooperation.
作者 陈衍 江婷 罗文珺 王芹 CHEN Yan;JIANG Ting;LUO Wen-jun;WANG Qin(Psychology Department,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025,China;College of Ocean Engineering,Guangdong Ocean University,Zhanjiang 524088,China;Faculty of Psychology,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300074,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第3期516-520,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题(基金号:DBA160252)“自我调控对大学生道德行为的影响及其生理机制研究”。
关键词 社会价值取向 贡献情境 分配 公平评价 事件相关电位 Social value orientation Contribution context Distribution Fair evaluation ERP
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献57

  • 1周浩,龙立荣,王燕,王忠军,吴怡,柯善玉.分配公正、程序公正、互动公正影响效果的差异[J].心理学报,2005,37(5):687-693. 被引量:38
  • 2谢义忠,萧爱鈴,任孝鹏,时勘.程序公平对工作满意度、组织承诺的影响:工作不安全感的中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(2):138-141. 被引量:24
  • 3严进 王重鸣.两难对策中价值取向对群体合作行为的影响[J].心理学报,2000,3:332-332. 被引量:12
  • 4Anderson, W. D. , & Patterson, M. L. (2008). Effects of social value orientations on fairness judgments. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 223-246. 被引量:1
  • 5Balliet, D. , Li, N. P. , Macfarlan, S. J. , & Van Vugt, M. (2011). Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin, 137 ( 6 ), 881 - 909. 被引量:1
  • 6Bogaert, S., Boone, C., & Declerck, C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas : A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47 (3) , 453 - 480. 被引量:1
  • 7Buchan, N. R. , Croson, R. T. A. , & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the Investment Game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(3 -4), 466 - 476. 被引量:1
  • 8Camerer, C., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (2), 209 - 219. 被引量:1
  • 9Dawes, R. M., & Messick, D. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35 ( 2 ), 111 - 116. 被引量:1
  • 10De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15 (1), 5 -18. 被引量:1

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部