期刊文献+

两种轻型汽车能耗及续驶里程试验方法对比 被引量:1

Comparisons of Two Test Methods for Energy Consumption and Driving Range of Light-duty Vehicles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从试验工况、试验过程、计算方法等方面对比分析了GB/T19753—2013和GB/T19753—2021两种插电式混合动力汽车能量消耗量试验方法,以及GB/T 18386—2017和GB/T18386.1—2021两种纯电动汽车能量消耗量和续驶里程试验方法。并分别对5辆轻型插电式混合动力汽车及5辆轻型纯电动汽车进行测试,对比分析了续驶里程、能量消耗量以及加权油耗的变化,总结了切换试验方法对插电式混合动力汽车及纯电动汽车测试结果的影响。 This article compares and analyzes the test methods of GB/T 19753—2013 and GB/T 19753—2021 for the energy consumption of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles(PHEV) from the aspects of test conditions, test process and calculation methods, as well as GB/T 18386—2017 and GB/T 18386.1—2021 two kinds of blade electric vehicles(BEV) energy consumption and driving range test methods. 5 light-duty plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and 5 light-duty pure electric vehicles were tested respectively, and the changes in driving range, energy consumption and weighted fuel consumption were compared and analyzed. The effects of switching test methods on the test results of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and pure electric vehicles are summarized.
作者 马志成 杜阳 杨帆 张罗伟 MA Zhicheng;DU Yang;YANG Fan;ZHANG Luowei(CATARC Automotive Test Center(Tianjin)Company Limited,Tianjin 300300,China)
出处 《汽车实用技术》 2022年第12期101-106,共6页 Automobile Applied Technology
关键词 插电式混合动力汽车 纯电动汽车 续驶里程 能量消耗量 试验方法 Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles Blade electric vehicles Driving range Energy consumption Test methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献49

共引文献41

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部