摘要
《刑法修正案(十一)》对骗取贷款罪的入罪条件进行了限缩修正,删去“或者有其他严重情节的”规定,这是骗取贷款罪立法上的进步,值得肯定。推动《刑法修正案(十一)》对该罪进行修正的原因可从现实需要和理论促进两个维度展开分析。鉴于《刑法修正案(十一)》正式施行时间较短,笔者仅选取249份骗取贷款罪公开文书为样本做实证分析,认为立法修正后骗取贷款罪的司法适用需更加审慎地处理好认定问题,即要合理界定本罪的保护法益、注意把握本罪的犯罪构成以及恰当定性“给银行或者其他金融机构造成重大损失”,这样才能在取得较好司法成效的同时,推动我国社会主义市场经济合规、持续和健康发展。
Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law has limited the incriminating conditions of the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means,deleting the provision of“or other serious circumstances”,which is a progress in the legislation of the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means and worthy of affirmation.The reasons for the revision of the crime in Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law can be analyzed from two dimensions of practical need and theoretical promotion.In view of the short period of the official implementation of Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law,only 249 public documents of the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means are selected as samples for empirical analysis.The judicial application of the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means after the legislative amendment should deal with the identification more prudently,that is,the protection interests of this crime should be defined reasonably,the criminal constitution of this crime should be grasped and“causing heavy losses to banks or other financial institutions”should be defined properly,so as to achieve better judicial results,in the meanwhile,promote the policy abiding,sustainable and healthy development of China's socialist market economy.
出处
《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第3期13-22,共10页
Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金
安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目“经济犯罪刑事可罚性理论系统构建与司法证成研究”(AHSKY2019D007)。
关键词
《刑法修正案(十一)》
骗取贷款罪
其他严重情节
立法修改
法律适用
Amendment(XI)to the Criminal Law
the crime of obtaining loans by fraudulent means
other serious circumstances
legislation amendment
judicial application
