期刊文献+

郑州市冬季大气PM_(2.5)金属元素来源及健康风险评价 被引量:15

Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Metal Elements in Ambient PM_(2.5)in the Winter of Zhengzhou
原文传递
导出
摘要 以郑州市2019年12月大气PM_(2.5)为对象,分析其中Ca、Fe、K、Mg、Sb、Na、As、Cu、Pb、Zn、V、Co、Cr和Ni含量,运用地累积指数(geo-accumulation index,I_(geo))和正定矩阵因子模型(positive matrix factorization,PMF)分析元素污染程度和来源,采用美国EPA健康风险评价模型对重金属元素的健康风险进行评价.结果显示,采样期间日均ρ(PM_(2.5))为108μg·m^(-3),金属元素中ρ(Ca)最高(5.9μg·m^(-3)).地累积指数结果表明,Sb污染程度最高,Sb、As和Cu造成极重污染,PMF解析结果表明,采样期间研究区域金属元素来源有冶金工业源、交通移动源、固体废物焚烧源和燃煤与扬尘混合源.不同污染水平下儿童所受非致癌风险更高而成年人所受致癌风险更高,各金属元素对人体的非致癌风险总体上在人体可接受范围,而As造成的致癌风险超出可接受范围.各类源HQ值均小于1,非致癌风险可忽略不计,具体排序为:燃煤与扬尘混合源>固体废物焚烧源>冶金工业源>交通移动源.各类源的ILCR排序为:燃煤与扬尘混合源>冶金工业源>固体废物焚烧源>交通移动源,其中燃煤与扬尘混合源ILCR超过人体可接受范围. PM_(2.5)samples were taken at the environmental monitoring station of Zhengzhou city in December,2019,after which the metal elements Ca,Fe,K,Mg,Sb,Na,As,Cu,Pb,Zn,V,Co,Cr,and Ni were analyzed.The pollution degree and sources of metal elements were analyzed using the geo-accumulation index and PMF model.Additionally,the health risk of heavy metal elements was evaluated with the health risk assessment models of the US EPA.The composition test showed that the daily averageρ(PM_(2.5))was 108μg·m^(-3),andρ(Ca)was the highest among all metal elements(5.9μg·m^(-3)).The geo-accumulation index showed that the pollution degree of Sb was the highest,and Sb,As,and Cu caused heavily pollution.The PMF result showed that metallurgy,vehicles,solid waste incineration,and the mixed source of coal burning and dust were the main contributing sources of metal elements.At different pollution levels,children were under higher non-carcinogenic risk,whereas adults were under higher carcinogenic risk.The carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of all metal elements were generally at an acceptable level,except the carcinogenic risk of As.The non-carcinogenic risks of all sources were negligible with HQ values under 1,and their ranking was as follows:the mixed source of coal burning and dust>solid waste incineration>metallurgy>vehicles.The ranking of ILCR values was:the mixed source of coal burning and dust>metallurgy>solid waste incineration>vehicles,among which the ILCR of the mixed source of coal burning and dust exceeded the acceptable range.
作者 姚森 王乾恒 薛妍 史来文 张俊美 杨书申 YAO Sen;WANG Qian-heng;XUE Yan;SHI Lai-wen;ZHANG Jun-mei;YANG Shu-shen(School of Energy and Environment,Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou 450007,China;Key Laboratory of Beijing on Regional Air Pollution Control,College of Environmental and Energy Engineering,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China;Xinzheng Branch of Zhengzhou Ecological Environment Bureau,Zhengzhou 451100,China;Henan Tianlang Ecological Technology Co.,Ltd.,Zhengzhou 450100,China)
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第5期2329-2335,共7页 Environmental Science
基金 河南省重点研发与推广专项(212102310078) 河南省自然科学基金项目(202400410320)。
关键词 郑州市 PM_(2.5) 重金属 健康风险 正定矩阵因子模型(PMF) Zhengzhou City PM_(2.5) heavy metals health risk positive matrix factorization(PMF)
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献206

共引文献318

同被引文献260

引证文献15

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部