摘要
1935—1936年间,胡风与周扬就典型问题展开论争,这是他们之间的第一次公开论争,也开启了典型论在中国现代文论史上的理论探讨。目前学术界关于胡风、周扬典型论争的研究,较多体现出“胡是而周非”的评价取向。虽有学者提出质疑,但他们不及细致梳理,未能理清论争的原因、实质及意义。本文通过对论争发生的原因与论争的焦点等问题的重新解析,认为周扬的典型论更符合艺术规律,更有利于文学的发展。细察之,周扬在突显典型个性的重要性,注重从人出发等方面引领着典型理论的中国化探索。
Hu Feng and Zhou Yang had a debate on types from 1935 to 1936.It was the first public debate between them and also initiated the discussion on types in the history of modern Chinese literary theory.At present,the research mostly shows that Hu Feng was right and Zhou Yang was wrong.Some scholars raised questions without understanding the reason,the essence and the significance of the debate.It can be seen that Zhou Yang’s theory of types is more in line with the law of art and more conducive to the development of literature through the re-analysis of the causes and center of the debate.Zhou Yang led the exploration of the theory of types in China with an emphasis on people’s individuality.
作者
许丽
刘锋杰
XU Li;LIU Fengjie(College of Liberal Arts,Gannan Normal University,Ganzhou,Jiangxi 341000;College of Liberal Arts,Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215031)
出处
《中国文学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期22-30,共9页
Research of Chinese Literature
基金
江西省社会科学规划项目“中国当代文论中的‘写人论’研究”(18WX19)
江西省高校人文社会科学项目“形象理论与中国当代人物塑造理论的建构”(ZGW18206)。
关键词
胡风
周扬
典型论争
中国化
Hu Feng
Zhou Yang
argument on types
sinicization
