摘要
在以辞格为转向的学术背景中,辞格的认知性研究令人瞩目,渊源深厚的论辩性却尚未获得关注。中国辞格论辩观源流考从先秦至当代五大历史时期的相关要著中,考辨出近二十种辞格论辩功能,如逻辑、人格、情感、在场、认同、谋篇、契境、传道等;详察了所涉诸多论辩性辞格,既有比喻、夸张、用典等转义格,又有对照、反问、反复等非转义格;简要比较了西方相应阶段的辞格论辩观,发现双方涉及的论辩性辞格和辞格的论辩功能总体上相当,各有独特处,差别主要在于中国辞格论辩观在古代是吉光片羽,在现当代仍较为零散,未能如西方相关专论产生冲击。系统化辞格的论辩性研究应成为我国辞格转向中的后浪,在激发自身能量的同时,可推助辞格认知论等的深入,或引动论辩产生知识的辞格认识论新潮。
In the current figure-oriented academia,cognitive features of rhetorical figures have been widely explored;however,their rich argumentative roles remain unduly neglected.A survey of the figurative history of Chinese rhetoric reveals that there exist about a score of argumentative functions:logos,ethos,pathos,presence,identification,arrangement,kairos,truth-conveying,etc.,and that the argumentative figures include both tropes(e.g.metaphor,hyperbole,allusion)and schemes(e.g.antithesis,rhetorical question,repetition).A brief comparison with the related studies in Western rhetoric displays the similarities in argumentative figures and functions as well as the differences which mainly lie in our lack of the systematic study.Systematizing studies on figures’argumentative functions,thus,should become a driving force of Chinese figurative turn,to explore the argumentative capacity,promote the cognitive research,and spur the new epistemic inquiry.
作者
袁影
YUAN Ying(School of Foreign Languages,Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,China)
出处
《太原师范学院学报(社会科学版)》
2022年第2期54-65,共12页
Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社科基金“常用修辞格的论辩性语篇功能研究”(15BYY178)。
关键词
辞格
论辩功能
源流
中国修辞学
西方修辞学
rhetorical figures
argumentative functions
origin and development
Chinese rhetoric
Western rhetoric