期刊文献+

面向“卡脖子”问题的知识创新生态系统分析:核心挑战、理论构建与现实路径 被引量:28

An analysis of the knowledge innovation ecosystem to handle the"stranglehold"challenges:The core challenges,theory construction and realization path
原文传递
导出
摘要 新形势下,面对关键核心技术“卡脖子”问题的挑战,系统提升我国科技研究的整体水平迫在眉睫。然而,我国现有知识创新生态研究的基本思路仍是以“大学、企业、政府”构成的“三螺旋”框架,无法体现新时代多元化主体、多样化路径、多种创新模式的平行共存与协同演化特征,致使研究者破题“卡脖子”难题时缺乏整合性视角与适用性框架的支撑。本研究基于知识创新范式转型背景下影响我国以系统工具解决“卡脖子”问题的核心挑战,深入探究新时代“模式3”知识创新“多重螺旋”(N-tuple helices)生态系统的主体特征与拓扑结构。以之为基础,讨论系统性提升我国科研创新能力,应对“卡脖子”挑战的可行路径与具体措施。 The tension between the international situation and domestic development has made the problem of"Stranglehold"of key technologies an important challenge restricting the sustainable development of my China's economy and society.Hence,exploring innovative development paths to respond to and solve this challenge has become an important topic in the field of knowledge innovation.Fundamentally,knowledge innovation is the source and foundation of key core technological innovations and breakthroughs.It not only inspires and guides the research and breakthroughs at the source of basic research of key technology,but also acts on each innovation stage from experimentation,development to marketization,providing it with a direct or indirect knowledge base and ideological source.It should be recognized that the so-called"Stranglehold"of key technologies does not only refer to the"stuck"of a single technology,but a non-self-controllable problem of a knowledge cluster formed by a"package"of technologies in the industrial chain of a certain field.From this point of view,the"Stranglehold"challenges of key technologies are a systematic problem.According to the idea of"systematic solution to systemic problems",the overcoming and breakthrough of key technologies is a complex systematic project,which requires the overall design and planning of systematic thinking.Faced with the challenge of"Stranglehold"of key technologies,it is urgent to systematically improve the overall performance of basic research in China.However,the existing knowledge innovation research in China is still based on the"triple-helix"(university-enterprise-government)framework,which cannot reflect the parallel coexistence and co-evolution characteristics of diversified subjects,diversified paths and diversified knowledge innovation modes in the new era.Thus,it fails to find an integrated view or an appropriate framework when researchers look into the"Stranglehold"challenge.To explore the problem of"Stranglehold"from a systematic perspective,it is necessary to est
作者 王璐瑶 曲冠楠 Juan Rogers Wang Luyao;Qu Guannan;Juan Rogers(School of Economics and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Public Policy and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;School of Public Policy,Georgia Institute of Technology,Atlanta 30332,Georgia,USA)
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第4期94-102,共9页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金重点国际合作研究项目:“新兴产业全球创新网络形成机制、演进特征及对创新绩效的影响研究”(71810107004) 中国博士后科学基金(2021M691791)。
关键词 “卡脖子”问题 知识创新 关键核心技术突破 创新生态系统 多重螺旋 technology"stranglehold" knowledge innovation key technology breakthrough innovation ecosystem multiple helices
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献168

  • 1陈劲.从技术引进到自主创新的学习模式[J].科研管理,1994,15(2):32-34. 被引量:236
  • 2Adam, B. & Groves, C., 2011, "Futures Tended: Care and Future-oriented Responsibility", Bulletin of Science, Technol- ogy & Society, Vol.31, No. 1, pp. 17-27. 被引量:1
  • 3Astin, A. W., 2012,Assessment for Excellence : The Philos- ophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Educa- tion, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 被引量:1
  • 4Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C. & Guston, D. H., 2008, 38 Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnoiogy : Foresight, Engage- ment and Integration. 被引量:1
  • 5Beesley, L. G., 2003, "Science Policy in Changing Times : Are Governments Poised to Take Full Advantage of an Institution in Transition", Research Policy, Vol.32, No.8, pp. 1519~ 1531. 被引量:1
  • 6Blok, V., 2014, "Look Who's Talking: Responsible Inno-ration, the Paradox of Dialogue and the Voice of the Other in Communication and Negotiation Processes", Journal of Responsi- ble Innovation, Vol.1, No.2, pp.171-190. 被引量:1
  • 7Borm, P. J., Robbins, D., Haubold, S., Kuhlbusch, T., Fissan, H., Donaldson & Oberdorster, E., 2006, "The Potential Risks of Nanomaterials: A Review Carried out for ECETOC" , Particle and Fibre Toxicology, Vol.3, No. 11, pp. 1-35. 被引量:1
  • 8Braun, K., Moore, A., Herrmann, S. L. & K~nninger, S., 2010, "Science Governance and the Politics of Proper Talk:Gov- ernmental Bioethics as a New Technology of Reflexive Govern- ment", Economy and Society, Vol.39, No.4, pp.510-533. 被引量:1
  • 9Briggle, A., 2010, A Rich Bioethics, South Bend : Univer- sity of Notre Dame Press. 被引量:1
  • 10Brouwer, W., 1994, "Taking Responsibility for the Impli- cations of Science" , Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 14, No.4, pp.192~202. 被引量:1

共引文献243

同被引文献520

引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部