期刊文献+

“双减”政策背景下中考物理命题质量研究——基于SEC一致性视角 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 提高中考命题质量是落实“双减”政策的关键举措之一,亦是促进义务教育优质均衡发展的重要手段.本文基于SEC一致性视角,分析近5年广东省中考物理试卷与《义务教育物理课程标准(2011年版)》之间的一致性.结果表明:两者之间的一致性水平尚未达到统计学意义,且总体呈现下降趋势.由此,命题人员应基于课程标准科学命题,充分发挥中考“指挥棒”的正向引导作用,实现学校、家庭和社会的共同“减负”,全力推进义务教育高质量、高水平发展.
出处 《中学物理》 2022年第8期21-24,共4页
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1Norman,L.Webb. Alignment of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States [ R]. Washington, DC :Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999.23. 被引量:1
  • 2S. Sireei,F. Robin,K. Meara,H. Rogers,H. Swaninathan. An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework [A]. N. Raju,J. Pelligrino,M. Bertenthal,K. Mitchell,L. Jones (Eds.). Grading the Nation's Report Card: Research from the Evaluation of NAEP [C]. Washington, DC : National Academies Press,2000.74-100. 被引量:1
  • 3R. Rothman,J. Slattery,J. Vranek, L. Resnick. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing[ J ]. Educational Assessment, 2004,9 (1-2) : 1-27. 被引量:1
  • 4N. Webb. Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education (Research Monograph No. 6) [ M ]. Washington, DC : Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 5N. Webb. Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States (Research Monograph No. 18) [M]. Washington,DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 6A. Martone,S. Sireci. Evaluating Alignment between Curriculum,As- sessment,and Instruction[J]. Review of Educational Research,2009,79(4) : 1332-1361. 被引量:1
  • 7Achieve Inc. An Alignment Analysis of Washington State's College Readiness Mathemat- ics Standards with Various Local Placement Tests. Washington,DC : Achieve Inc,2006. 被引量:1
  • 8A. Porter,J. Smithson. Defining,Developing,and Using Curriculum Indicators. (CPRE Research Report Series No. RR--O48)[R ]. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 9A. Porter,M. Polikoff,T. Zeidner,J. Smithson. The Quality of Content Analysis of State Stu- dent Achievement Tests and Content Standards [J]. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2008,27(4) : 2-14. 被引量:1
  • 10R. Blank,A. Porter, J. Smithson. New Tools for Analyzing Teaching, Curriculum and Standards in Mathematics and Science[M ]. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Omcers, 2001. 被引量:1

共引文献54

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部