摘要
目的探讨PTC联合双向评价在麻醉住培生急诊麻醉教学中的研究价值。方法选择本院2019年和2020年两届麻醉专业住培医生80名为研究对象,按随机数表法分为实验组和对照组两组,每组各40名。对照组采取传统教学方法教授急诊麻醉处理;实验组使用将PTC理念融于急诊麻醉教学中的方法授课。同时将该院28名取得麻醉住培带教资格的教师随机分为两组,一组为对照组带教,另一组为实验组带教,每组各14名。再对师生双方进行考核:(1)学生考核:进行理论考核、操作考核、综合能力考核;及学生在临床应用能力、自主学习能力、团队协作能力、知识面扩展、调动学习兴趣方面的满意度调查;(2)带教教师考核:由学员打分,考察带教教师临床带教能力、授课、师德三方面,分为优、良、一般、差四个等级及带教教师在注重实效性和可行性、激发学生学习兴趣、利于自身能力提升、利于教学质量提高、利于教学改革可持续性发展方面的满意度调查。结果两组学生在性别、年龄和学历上差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),实验组学生理论考核成绩为(32.45±0.77)分,和对照组的(31.50±0.74)分相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而实验组学生操作考核成绩为(33.10±0.55)分、综合能力考核成绩(14.98±0.22)分,明显高于对照组的(30.03±0.59)分和(13.90±0.20)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且实验组学生在自主学习能力(87.5%)、团队协作能力(70%)、知识面扩展(85%)及调动学习兴趣(80%)四方面满意度明显高于对照组的55%、40%、50%和55%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组带教教师在性别、年龄及临床带教年限上差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05),实验组教师在激发学生学习兴趣(85.7%)、利于自身能力提升(78.6%)两方面满意度明显高于对照组的42.8%和35.7%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论PTC联合双向评价在麻醉住培医生急�
Objective To explore the research value of PTC combined with two-way evaluation in the teaching of emergency anesthesia among anesthesiology residents.Methods Eighty residents majored in anesthesiology of grade 2019 and 2020 were enrolled as study objects,and they were divided into experimental group and control group according to random number table method,with 40 patients in each group.The emergency anesthesiawas taught by traditional teaching methods in the control group.The experimental group used the method of integrating PTC concept into the teaching of emergency anesthesia.At the same time,28 teachers with anesthesia training qualifications were randomly divided into two groups:one group teaching the control group and the other group teaching the experimental group,with 14 teachers in each group.Both the teachers and the residents were assessment:(1)Student assessment:theory assessment,operation assessment and comprehensive ability assessment;And the satisfaction survey of students in clinical application ability,independent learning ability,teamwork ability,knowledge expansion and learning interest mobilization.(2)Teachers'assessment:Students score teachers'clinical teaching ability,teaching and ethics,which are divided into four grades:excellent,good,average and poor.And the satisfaction survey of teachers in paying attention to effectiveness and feasibility,stimulating students'interest in learning,improving their own ability,improving teaching quality,and promoting the sustainable development of teaching reform.Results There were no significant differences in gender,age and educational background between the two groups(all P>0.05).The theoretical examination scores of the experimental group(32.45±0.77)and the control group(31.50±0.74)scores were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The scores of operation assessment(33.10±0.55)and comprehensive ability assessment(14.98±0.22)of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group(30.03±0.59)and(13.90±0.20),the differen
作者
梅玫
张从利
程向阳
陈德尚
Mei Mei;Zhang Congli;Cheng Xiangyang;Chen Deshang(Department of anaesthesia medicine,the first affiliated hospital of Bengbu Medical College,Bengbu,Anhui 233004,China;department of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery,the first affiliated hospital of Bengbu Medical College,Bengbu,Anhui 233004,China)
出处
《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》
2022年第3期276-280,共5页
Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
基金
蚌埠医学院2021年校级质量工程项目(2021fyjyxm15),安徽省高等学校省级质量工程重点项目(2019mooc591)。
关键词
PTC
急诊麻醉
住培生培养
PTC
Emergency anesthesia
Resident cultivation
