摘要
为考察全球供应链中劳工标准民间规制基本理论假设的完备性,以一家大型全球零售商的30个供应商和另一家实施70个全球品牌的劳工标准民间规制的大型零售商为对象进行案例分析,我们发现三个先验性的基本假设均存在明显缺陷:全球品牌商的采购影响力并不能促使所有供应商都遵守民间规制,民间规制的审计已经成为一种商品化、不连续和以外包为主的活动,并不能真实地反映供应商工厂的实际情况,而且审计结果在全球品牌商的采购决策中也没有起到显著作用。这些基本假设的缺陷在一定程度上揭示了劳工标准的民间规制实施了近30年仍收效甚微的原因,为民间规制模式创新和效果提升提供了理论依据。
To examine the validity of basic theoretical assumptions of private regulation of labor standards in the global supply chain,30 suppliers of a large global retailer and another large global supplier which has experienced private regulation of labor standards from 70 global brands are taken as examples for the case analysis.There are obvious defects in the following three untested basic assumptions:the purchasing power influence of global brands does not encourage all suppliers to comply with the rules of private regulation;the auditing of private regulation has become a commoditized,discontinuous and outsourcing-oriented activity that does not truly reflect the actual situation of suppliers’factories;and the audit results do not apparently play any role in sourcing decisions.To some extent,the defects of these basic assumptions theoretically explain why private regulation of labor standards still has little effect after nearly 30 years’implementation.It also provides theoretical foundations for further improvement of innovative models and effect of private regulation in general.
出处
《社会科学辑刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期141-154,共14页
Social Science Journal
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA136)
国家社会科学基金项目(18BJY108)。
关键词
民间规制
劳工标准
行为守则
全球供应链
private regulation
labor standards
code of conduct
global supply chains
