期刊文献+

地西他滨联合预激改良IAG方案治疗MDS相关急性髓系白血病的临床效果 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察地西他滨(DAC)联合预激改良IAG方案治疗骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)相关急性髓系白血病(AML)的临床效果。方法选取2014年1月—2019年10月泉州市第一医院收治的MDS相关AML患者28例,均接受DAC联合IAG方案治疗。分析治疗效果与不良反应发生情况,并分析影响不良反应发生的因素。结果患者疗效评价达完全缓解13例(46.43%)、部分缓解7例(25.00%)、未缓解8例(28.57%),总缓解率为71.43%;高危组与低危组完全缓解率与总缓解率比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);以年龄<60岁与≥60岁患者进行比较,2组完全缓解率与总缓解率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);2个疗程患者粒细胞缺乏、血小板减少持续时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);≥60岁组患者粒细胞缺乏时间(7.2±1.6)d,长于<60岁组的(4.5±2.0)d(t=3.914,P=0.001);28例患者出现感染和血小板减少致出血,及恶心呕吐、心脏毒性等非血液学毒性的不良反应,均可耐受。结论DAC联合预激改良IAG方案治疗MDS相关AML的临床效果良好,而且患者可耐受性较好,不良反应也在可控范围内,值得推广应用。
作者 黄涛 刘德斌
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2022年第11期67-69,73,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献60

  • 1Quesnel B, Guillerm G, Vereecque R, et ah Methylation of the p15 (1NK4b) gene in myelodysplastic syndromes is frequent and acquired during disease progression [ J ]. Blood, 1998, 91 ( 8 ) : 2985-2990. 被引量:1
  • 2Lfibbert M, Sueiu S, Baila L, et ah Low-dose decitabine versus best supportive care in elderly patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: final results of the randomized phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Group and the German MDS Study Group [J]. J Clin Oneol, 2011, 29 (15):1987-1996. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.9245. 被引量:1
  • 3Kantarjian H, Issa JP, Rosenfeld CS, et al. Decitabine improves patient outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a phase III randomized study [J]. Cancer, 2006, 106 (8):1794- 1803. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21792. 被引量:1
  • 4Kantarjian H, Oki Y, Garcia-Manero G, et al. Results of a randomized study of 3 schedules of low-dose decitabine in higher- risk myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia[J]. Blood, 2007, 109 ( 1 ):52-57. doi: 10. l 182/blood-2006-05-021162. 被引量:1
  • 5Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes [J]. Blood, 1997, 89(6):2079-2088. 被引量:1
  • 6Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes [J]. Blood, 2012, 120(12):2454-2465. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03- 420489. 被引量:1
  • 7Malcovati L, Della PMG, Strupp C, et al. Impact of the degree of anemia on the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and its integration into the WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS)[J]. Haematologica, 2011, 96( 10):1433-1440. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.044602. 被引量:1
  • 8Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, et al. Clinical applica- tion and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia [J]. Blood, 2006, 108(2):419-425. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149. 被引量:1
  • 9Steensma DP, Baer MR Slack JL, et al. Multicenter study ofdecitabine administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to adults with myelodysplastic syndromes: the alternative dosing for outpatient treatment (ADOPT) trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27 (23):3842-3848. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6550. 被引量:1
  • 10Silverman LR, Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, et al. Continued azacitidine therapy beyond time of first response improves quality of response in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes [J]. Cancer, 2011, 117 (12):2697-2702. doi: 10.1002/cncr. 25774. 被引量:1

共引文献75

同被引文献25

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部