期刊文献+

自制入路通道的经脐单孔腹腔镜在妇科常见手术中的应用 被引量:4

Application of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy with self-made approach in common gynecological operations
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨自制入路通道的经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科常见手术中的临床应用。方法回顾性收集2018年1月至2020年9月克拉玛依市中心医院成功开展的自制入路通道的经脐单孔腹腔镜手术105例,并选择条件匹配的多孔腹腔镜手术105例作对照。比较两组手术时间,术中失血量,术后首次排气时间,术后首次下床活动时间,术后24 h疼痛评分,术后3个月患者手术满意度评分,术后3个月医生对切口美容评分,术后住院时间,术中医生的感受评分及术中、术后并发症。结果所有手术均在腹腔镜下顺利完成,未中转为开腹手术,未加打辅助孔,术中未出现明显并发症。单孔腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量大于多孔腹腔镜组(均P<0.05)。单孔腹腔镜组切口美容评分明显优于多孔腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。多孔腹腔镜组术中医生感受评分优于单孔腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。两组术后首次排气时间、术后首次下床活动时间、术后24 h疼痛评分、患者手术满意度评分及术后住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。多孔腹腔镜组卵巢囊肿剥除术、子宫肌瘤剔除术、全子宫切除术手术时间及术中出血量小于单孔腹腔镜组(均P<0.05),两组输卵管切除术及附件切除术的手术时间及术中出血量比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。多孔腹腔镜组不同手术类型术中医生感受均优于单孔腹腔组(均P<0.05)。结论在病例选择合适的情况下,经脐单孔腹腔镜手术在妇科手术中是可行的,单孔腹腔镜突出的优点为术后美容效果。 Objective To explore the clinical application of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy with self-made approach in common gynecological operations.Methods 105 cases of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery with self-made approach successfully(single-port laparoscopic group)carried out in Karamay Central Hospital from January 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively collected,and 105 cases of multi-port laparoscopic surgery(multi-port laparoscopic group)with matching conditions were selected.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative first exhaust time,postoperative first out of bed activity time,postoperative 24-h pain score,postoperative satisfaction score of patients 3 months after operation,incision cosmetic score of doctors 3 months after operation,postoperative hospital stay,intraoperative surgeon′s feeling score and intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results All operations were successfully completed under laparoscopy,without conversion to laparotomy,without auxiliary holes,and no obvious complications occurred during the operation.The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the single-port laparoscopic group were greater than those in the multi-port laparoscopic group(all P<0.05).The incision cosmetic score of single-port laparoscopic group was significantly better than that of multi-port laparoscopic group(P<0.05).The intraoperative surgeon′s feeling score in multi-port laparoscopic group was better than that in single-port laparoscopic group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in the first postoperative exhaust time,the first postoperative out of bed activity time,24-hour postoperative pain score,surgical satisfaction score and postoperative hospital stay(all P>0.05).The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of ovarian cyst stripping,hysteromyomectomy and total hysterectomy in the multi-port laparoscopic group were less than those in the single-port laparoscopic group(all P<0.05
作者 贾小平 周静 马彩铃 Jia Xiaoping;Zhou Jing;Ma Cailing(Department of Gynecology,Karamay Central Hospital,Karamay 834000,China;Department of Gynecology,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China)
出处 《中国医师杂志》 CAS 2022年第3期361-365,共5页 Journal of Chinese Physician
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2019D01A09) 克拉玛依市中心医院科技项目(YK2018-9)。
关键词 腹腔镜检查 妇科外科手术 Umbilicus Laparoscopy Gynecologic surgical procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献113

  • 1冷金花,郎景和,张俊吉,冯凤芝,刘珠凤,孙大为,朱兰,赵学英.腹腔镜在附件包块治疗中的价值和安全性(附2083例报道)[J].现代妇产科进展,2006,15(3):173-176. 被引量:45
  • 2Goebel K, Goldberg JM. Women' s preference of cosmetic results after gynecologic surgery[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014, 21(1):64-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.004. 被引量:1
  • 3Boruta DM, Fagotti A, Bradford LS, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: initial multi-institutional experience for treatment of invasive cervical cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2014,21(3): 394-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.005. 被引量:1
  • 4Fagotti A, Boruta DM, Scambia G, et al. First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012,206(4):353.el-6. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajog.2012.01.031. 被引量:1
  • 5Park HS, Kim TJ, Song T, et al. Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a surgeon's experience with an initial 200 cases[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2011, 154(1):81-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.09.0og. 被引量:1
  • 6Park JY, Kim TJ, Kang HJ, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery in benign gynecology: perioperative and late complications of 515 cases[J]. Eur J Obstet Gyneco! Reprod Biol, 2013, 167(2):215-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11. 027. 被引量:1
  • 7Matos-Azevedo AM, Dfaz-Gumes MI, Prez-Duarte FJ, et al. Comparison of single access devices during cut and suturing tasks on simulator[J]. J Surg Res, 2014,192(2):356-367. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.017. 被引量:1
  • 8Uppal S, Frumovitz M, Eseobar P, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: review of literature and available technology[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2011,18(1): 12-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.013. 被引量:1
  • 9Kommu SS. Ex-vivo training model for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2011,7(1): 104-108. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.72398. 被引量:1
  • 10Bradford LS, Boruta DM. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: a review of the literature, tools, and techniques[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2013,68(4):295-304. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318286f673. 被引量:1

共引文献502

同被引文献56

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部