期刊文献+

循证视角下文献证据检索的科学性评价:缘起、指标与趋势 被引量:10

Scientific Evaluation of Literature Evidence Retrieval Quality from the Perspective of Evidence-based Research:Initiation,Index and Trend
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学化、规范化的循证社会科学研究以全面、精准的文献证据检索为基本保障。对文献证据检索的科学性评价在立足于传统的查全率和查准率指标,以及引入信度、效度等测量工具质量评价指标的基础上,进一步提出了饱和度、冗余度、敏感度等指标。基于循证社会科学的未来发展,可以发现,文献证据检索的科学性评价呈现出检索过程趋于标准化、检索结果评价趋于可计量化、不依赖于文献数据全集的自动化评估方法、考虑检索成本的效益等发展趋势。 The retrieval quality of literature evidence is the basic guarantee of high-level evidence-based research.Based on the analysis of the initial problem of document evidence retrieval in the field of evidence-based research,this paper draws on the reasonable components of traditional recall and precision indicators and overcomes their shortcomings,puts forward new literature evidence retrieval quality assessment indicators such as saturation,redundancy and sensitivity,and introduces the indicators of the quality of measurement tools such as reliability and validity into this field.Furthermore,this paper shed light on the future trend of scientific evaluation of literature evidence retrieval quality in evidence-based social science research.The literature quality evaluation index involved in this paper lays a foundation for the follow-up empirical research.
作者 周文杰 赵悦言 魏志鹏 杨克虎 Zhou Wenjie;Zhao Yueyan;Wei Zhipeng
出处 《图书与情报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期31-36,共6页 Library & Information
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“循证社会科学的理论体系、国际经验与中国路径研究”(项目编号:19ZDA142)研究成果之一。
关键词 循证社会科学 文献证据检索 科学性评价 指标体系 Evidence-based Social Science literature evidence retrieval scientific evaluation index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献17

共引文献254

同被引文献191

引证文献10

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部