期刊文献+

“3+4”中职阶段学生学习投入度现状调查与建议

Investigation and Suggestions on the Status Quo of Students’Learning Engagement in“3+4”Secondary Vocational Education Stage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关注学生学习投入度,是职业教育高质量发展与人才培养质量提升的内在要求。对"3+4"中职阶段学生学习投入度进行调查,发现"3+4"中职阶段学生学习投入度呈中等偏上水平、学生主动学习与师生互动水平较低、学生对学习投入自评满意度尚可,学生学习投入度在年级、专业、生源上存在显著差异,学生学习收获与环境支持力度密切相关。据此,提出提高"3+4"中职阶段学生学习投入度建议:营造良好班风学风,培养优秀学习习惯;持续优化课程内容,加大师生互动水平;高度重视心理健康,激发积极学习情绪;密切关注特殊群体,全面提高学习投入度。 Focusing on students’learning engagement is an inherent requirement for the high-quality development of vocational education and the improvement of the quality of talent training.A survey was conducted on students’learning engagement in the“3+4”secondary vocational education stage,and it was found that the“3+4”secondary vocational students’learning engagement was at an upper-middle level,the students’active learning and teacher-student interaction levels were low,and the students’learning engagement was low.The self-assessment satisfaction is acceptable.There are significant differences in students’learning engagement in grades,majors,and student sources.Students’learning gains are closely related to environmental support.Based on this,suggestions for improving the learning engagement of“3+4”secondary vocational students are proposed:Creating a good class style and study style and cultivating excellent study habits;continuing to optimize the course contents and increase the level of interaction between teachers and students;attaching great importance to mental health and stimulating positive learning emotions;paying close attention to special groups to comprehensively improve learning engagement.
作者 杨燕 Yang Yan(Changzhou Liu Guojun Vocational Technology College,Changzhou 213025)
出处 《职业技术教育》 北大核心 2021年第35期48-53,共6页 Vocational and Technical Education
基金 2020年度江苏高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“基于I-E-O模型的五年制高职学生学习投入度研究”(2020SJA0649),主持人:杨燕。
关键词 “3+4”贯通培养 中职阶段 学习投入度 问卷调查 “3+4”integrated cultivation secondary vocational education stage learning engagement questionnaire survey
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献54

  • 1约翰·亨利·纽曼.大学的理想(节本)[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001:2. 被引量:18
  • 2Alexander Astin. Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practice in Higher Education [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985. 135-136. 被引量:1
  • 3Vincent Tinto. Leaving College: Re- thinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (2nd ed.) [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. 114. 被引量:1
  • 4Ernest Pascarella, Patrick Terenzini. How College Affects Students, Volume2, A Third Decade of Research [M ]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.57. 被引量:1
  • 5Ernest PascareUa. How Effective Are the NSSE Benchmarks in Predicting Important Educational Outcomes? [J ]. Change, January/ February, 2010. 16-22. 被引量:1
  • 6Shouping Hu, Alexander C. McCormick. An Engagement-Based Student Typology and Its Relationship to College Outcomes [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2012, 53. 739. 被引量:1
  • 7Stephen Raudenbush, Anthony Bryk. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Second Edition) [M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication, 2002. 5-13. 被引量:1
  • 8Jennifer A. Fredricks, Phyllis C. Blumenfeld and Alison H. Paris. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence [J ]. Review of Educational Research, 2004, 74 (1): 60. 被引量:1
  • 9Hart Research Associates. Learning and Assessment: Trends in Undergraduate Education JR]. Washington, 2009. 4. 被引量:1
  • 10George D. Kuh. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations [J]. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009, 141. 5. 被引量:1

共引文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部