摘要
目的探讨采用综合性护理方法对晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗患者进行干预后对生活质量等产生的影响。方法将我院2017年7月至2019年5月收治的66例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者按照数字奇偶法分组;护理组(33例):采用常规传统护理方法+综合性护理方法完成肺癌化疗护理;对照组(33例):采用常规传统护理方法完成肺癌化疗护理;对组间体力评分、生活质量评分、癌因性疲乏数据、总依从率以及护理满意度(护理态度、护理全面性、护理细节、护理针对性、护理质量)评分展开对比。结果护理前,护理组心理因素评分(57.19±5.05)分、生理因素评分(47.29±4.35)分、环境因素评分(43.59±5.69)分、社会关系评分(45.69±5.19)分以及KPS评分(69.13±18.69)同对照组心理因素评分(56.59±4.52)分、生理因素评分(46.19±5.25)分、环境因素评分(44.11±4.05)分、社会关系评分(46.01±4.79)分以及KPS评分(68.59±20.03)分比较,未呈现出明显差异(P>0.05);护理后,护理组心理因素评分(66.29±4.39)分、生理因素评分(57.13±5.57)分、环境因素评分(59.12±4.25)分、社会关系评分(63.39±3.65)分以及KPS评分(86.49±11.49)均高于对照组心理因素评分(59.79±5.62)分、生理因素评分(49.49±5.15)分、环境因素评分(53.39±6.02)分、社会关系评分(57.49±3.69)分以及KPS评分(80.29±11.79)分(P<0.05);护理组晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗患者无疲乏以及轻度数据均高于对照组明显(P<0.05);护理组护理总依从率(96.97%)高于对照组(75.76%)(P<0.05);护理组护理态度(90.58±4.25)分、护理全面性(90.11±4.17)分、护理细节(92.28±5.29)分、护理针对性(91.77±4.17)分、护理质量(91.69±4.59)分均高于对照组护理态度(80.38±5.13)分、护理全面性(81.16±2.29)分、护理细节(81.89±4.32)分、护理针对性(81.68±5.13)分、护理质量(81.55±5.29)分(P<0.05)。结论综合性护理方式的运用,使得晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗患者体力�
Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing on the quality of life of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after chemotherapy intervention.Methods The 66 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who were treated in our hospital from July 2017 to May 2019 were divided into digital parity method;nursing group(33 cases):the conventional traditional nursing method+comprehensive nursing method was used to complete the chemotherapy of lung cancer;the control group group(33 cases):the conventional traditional nursing methods were used to complete the chemotherapy of lung cancer;the physical strength score,quality of life score,cancer-related fatigue data,total compliance rate and nursing satisfaction(nursing attitude,nursing comprehensiveness,nursing details,nursing pertinence,nursing quality)scores were compared.Results Before nursing,the scores of psychological factors(57.19±5.05),physiological factors(47.29±4.35),environmental factors(43.59±5.69),social relations(45.69±5.19)and KPS(69.13±5.69)in the nursing group;compared with the control group,the scores of psychological factors(56.59±4.52),physiological factors(46.19±5.25),environmental factors(44.11±4.05),social relations(46.01±4.79)and KPS(68.59±20.03)points,there was no significant difference(P>0.05);after nursing,the nursing group scored(66.29±4.39)points for psychological factors,(57.13±5.57)points for physiological factors,and(59.12±4.25)points for environmental factors,social relationship score(63.39±3.65)and KPS score(86.49±11.49)were higher than the control group's psychological factor score(59.79±5.62)score,physiological factor score(49.49±5.15)score,environmental factor score(53.39±6.02)score,social relationship score(57.49±3.69)score and KPS score(80.29±11.79)score(P<0.05);no fatigue and mild data in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy in the nursing group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05);the total nursing compliance rate(96.97%)in the nurs
作者
李慧
LI Hui(Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenyang Medical College,Shenyang 110002,China)
出处
《中国医药指南》
2022年第10期50-53,共4页
Guide of China Medicine
关键词
晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗
综合性护理
生活质量
体力
癌因性疲乏症状
Advanced non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy
Comprehensive nursing
Quality of life
Physical strength
Cancerous fatigue symptoms
