期刊文献+

参考知识产权立法模式进行数据确权的可行性分析

Feasibility Analysis of of Data Right Confirmation with Reference to the Intellectual Property Legislative Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在学术界,数据权制度是否应当建立、如何建立均尚无定论,但日前国务院提出“构建数据知识产权保护规则”,似乎已经明确将知识产权化作为数据权立法方向。基于数据和部分知识产权均与信息保护密不可分的相同点,本文认为参考知识产权立法模式进行数据确权的立法方向是可行的,并探索性地提出参考专利“专用权+特别赋权+公共利益限制”的立法框架来进行数据确权,参考商业秘密“合理保密措施为法定保护前提”的具体权能设置模式,对数据权增加“权利人采取合理手段实际控制数据”作为获得数据权保护的法定前提。 In academia,whether the data rights system should be established or how it should be established is still inconclusive,but the State Council recently proposed"building data intellectual property rights protection rules",which seems to have clearly made intellectual property rights the legislative direction of data rights.Based on the inseparable similarities between data and part of intellectual property rights and information pro⁃tection,this paper believes that it is feasible to refer to the legislative model of intellectual property rights for the legislative direction of data right confirmation,and exploratively proposes to refer to the legislative frame⁃work of patent"exclusive rights+special empowerment+public interest restrictions"to confirm data rights,and refers to the specific power setting model of"reasonable confidentiality measures are the prerequisite for le⁃gal protection"of trade secrets,and adds"the right holder to take reasonable measures to actually control the data"to the data right as the legal prerequisite for obtaining data rights protection.
作者 李亮伟 LI Liangwei(Beijing Dentons Law Offices,LLP(Zhengzhou),Zhengzhou Henan 450008)
出处 《河南科技》 2021年第32期154-158,共5页 Henan Science and Technology
关键词 数据确权 立法模式 知识产权 data right confirmation legislative model intellectual property
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献53

  • 1程啸.区块链技术视野下的数据权属问题[J].现代法学,2020,42(2):121-132. 被引量:50
  • 2彭礼堂,饶传平.网络隐私权的属性:从传统人格权到资讯自决权[J].法学评论,2006,24(1):57-62. 被引量:62
  • 3Karjala, Dennis S. Statement of Copyright and Intellectual Property Law Professors in Opposition to H. R. 604, H.R. 2589, and S. 505, the Copyright Term Extension Act, Submitted to the Committees on the Ju- diciary, United States Senate, United States House of Representative [ EB/OL ]. http://www, pubLic:, asu. edu/- dkarjala/legmats/1998 Statement. html. 被引量:1
  • 4[美]兰德斯,波斯纳.知识产权法的经济结构[M].金海军译,北京:北京大学出版社,2005:23-25;16. 被引量:1
  • 5Federal Trade Commission ( U. S ). To Promote Innovation:The Proper Balance of Competition and Pa- tent Law and Policy [ EB/OL]. www. ftc. gov/os/2003/ 10/innovationrpt. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 6Nelson, Richard R. The Market Economy, and the Scientific Commons [ J ]. Research Policy,2004, ( 3 ). 被引量:1
  • 7[澳]达沃豪斯,布雷斯韦特.信息封建主义[M].刘雪涛译,北京:知识产权出版社,2005. 被引量:1
  • 8Buchanan, James, Yong J. Yoon. Symmetric Tragedies : Commons and Anticommons [ J ]. Journal of Law and Economics ,2000, ( 1 ). 被引量:1
  • 9Chris Anderson. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired, 2008, 16 (7). 被引量:1
  • 10Albert-L~iszl6 Barab~isi. The network takeover. Nature Physics, 2012,8(1): 14-16. 被引量:1

共引文献2051

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部