摘要
摩崖石刻《郙阁颂》因有东汉、南宋、明代的三次镌刻,从而在名称、年代、文字、人物、书法艺术等方面,都留下了一些悬案和争议,历代的题跋、评析,从训诂学、考据学、文艺评论等方面都取得了巨大成就,从而使各类事项、各种问题日益明晰。但也有以讹传讹、以错为正的现象。《汉语大字典》中的“漯”属沿袭欧阳修对《郙阁颂》的误释而生造之词,颂文中“嶃漯”义为“高峻而潮湿”非其他,“平■”义为“平坦而干燥”,非单指“干燥”,“隤纳”义为“车辆翻覆”,而非《汉语大词典》所释之“坠入深渊”。
The cliff stone inscription“Fuge Song”was engraved three times in Eastern Han Dynasty,the Southern Song Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty,which left some pending cases and disputes in naming,age,characters,calligraphy art and so on.According to the research and analysis of previous dynasties,great achievements have been made in exegesis,textual research and literary review,However,there are also phenomena of spreading falsehood and taking mistakes as positive.The explanation of“Chao Luo”in Chinese Dictionary follows Ouyang Xiu’s misinterpretation to Ode to Fuge.In fact,“Zhan Luo”means“high,steep and humid”;“Ping Zao”means“flat and dry”,but not“dry”;“Tui Na”means“vehicle overturning”,but not“falling into the abyss”as explained in Chinese Dictionary.
作者
孙启祥
SUN Qixiang(Hanzhong Municipal Archives,Hanzhong,Shaanxi 723000)
出处
《陕西理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2022年第1期1-11,共11页
Journal of Shaanxi University of Technology(Social Science)
关键词
《郙阁颂》
序跋题记
碑石名称
嶃漯
隤纳
李翕
仇绋
Ode to Fuge
preface and postscript
name of stone inscription
Zhan luo
Tui Na
Li Xi
Qiu Fu
