摘要
“团结”存在动词与形容词的属性差异,现代以形容词义为主的“民族团结”以平等为前提,径由中国历部宪法不断发展完善。《宪法》第52条民族团结义务是新时代民族工作法治化的核心规范,对其宪法内涵,应从第52条自身及其分别与序言和总纲第4条的关系共三个层次梯度诠释;对其外延的解读则可从中央和地方两个层次的法制体系入手。民族团结作为基本义务进入宪法文本,有其坚实的理论、逻辑和渊源基础,其内涵明确、规范谱系定位清晰、实施机制完善。当前,应促进民族团结政策话语的法治转向,做好理论和实践双重准备,适时启动《民族团结进步条例》的制定。
Article 52 of the Constitution is the core norm of the legalization of ethnic work in the new era, but the relevant research is insufficient. There are differences in the attributes of verbs and adjectives of “Tuanjie”(unite and solidarity). “United Nationalities” in the modern times, which is of adjective attributes, is based on equality and has been continuously developed and improved by China’s Constitution. Its constitutional connotation should be interpreted at three levels: Article 52 itself, the Preamble and Article 4 of the general outline;while the interpretation of its extension can start from the legal system at the central and local levels. As a basic obligation, national unity has became the text of the Constitution. It has solid theoretical,logical and original foundations with clear connotations, an evident pedigree and perfect implementation mechanism. So it is necessary to promote the rule of law in the policy discourse of national unity, make theoretical and practical preparations, and timely formulate “Regulations on National Unity and Progress”.
作者
郑毅
ZHEN Yi(Law School,Minzu University of China,Beijing,100081)
出处
《云南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期80-92,共13页
Social Sciences in Yunnan
基金
2021年度教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“规范视野下的中国纵向治理法治体系研究”(项目号:21JHQ073)的阶段性成果
国家民委中青年英才培养计划“宪法视野下的新时代民族法制发展与完善研究”资助。
