摘要
文章运用文献对比法和词汇学理论对敦煌藏文文献P.T.1287中部分内容进行了全新解读和诠释,对文献中关于“■”和“■”等词汇进行了全面分析,得出此类与高原游牧生活相关词汇在整部文献和特定的语言境域中具有特殊含义。通过对大量同类词汇的辨析、考证和研究,细致地解释了该文献中部分词汇的特指意义。为整部文献内容解读提出了新的参考视角和方法,同时也对以往提出的一些看法和阐释提出疑问。合理、确切的阐释更有助于深入研究该文献,在查阅和检索了大量资料、文献以及参照相关著作中出现的同类词汇后,对敦煌藏文文献P.T.1287中部分存在解读模糊、笼统的词汇进行了分析和释义。认为相较于将“■”解读成庄户或牦牛,“马”的意象解读更为恰当,比如“■”是指头部垂下之意,而“■”意为马、骡,驴颈上所长的鬃毛,“■”为迅速,“■”为主人之意,故解读为马的主人更贴近早期藏文文献的原始意义。
It was recorded in the Dunhuang Tibetan literature of P.T.1287 that the Tibetan phrase“Dud-rNgog-Chags-Kyi-rKyen-Du-gShegs”is found in numerous ancient and modern texts.It has different ways of interpretation,but the author believes that there is a certain degree of interpretation,therefore,there are some misunderstandings in literature interpretation.With the help of literary comparison method and linguistics theory,misconceptions are analyzed and corrected by means of historical documents,especially lexicology to prove that this sentence is a general term for livestock such as yak is a kind of misreading and failure to conduct in-depth research.This paper argues that it is better to interpret horse as the general term of Tibetan livestock when it is believed that“Dud”means head hanging down,and“rNgog”is worn on the neck of horse,mule and donkey as called mane,in addition to“Chags”should be read as quick and“rKyen”meaning master,hence the solution is that it is more appropriate to read as the owner of the horse,and a great deal of argument is made for this.
作者
朋毛才让
Phag-Mo-Tshe-Ring(College of Humanities,Tibet University,Lhasa,Tibet,850000)
出处
《青海师范大学学报（藏文版）》
2021年第4期102-110,共9页
Journal of Qinghai Normal University (Tibetan language)
