摘要
人们容易把柏拉图的"辩证法"看作一个单纯性质的概念,然而基于意见与知识的关系,我们可以得出柏拉图辩证法前后期有着明显差异。柏拉图前期为了批判智者派把意见与知识混淆,强调意见与知识的对立:意见是变动的、杂多的,知识的对象——理念(eidos)是静止的、不变的。后期辩证法反思前期辩证法的观点,而得出:意见对于知识的获得有着重要意义,真意见即知识;同时,理念是运动的、变化的、内在蕴含矛盾的、相互之间充满联系的。
It is easy for people to regard Plato s“dialectic”as a category of pure nature.However,based on the relationship between opinion and knowledge,we can conclude that Plato s dialectic has obvious differences in the early and late stages.Plato s early dialectic emphasized that the doxa is opposite to the epistēmē.At the same time,the object of epistēmē—the eidos is static and constant;the later dialectics reflect on the point of view of the previous dialectics,and concludes:The doxa have important significance for the acquisition of epistēmē.The true doxa is epistēmē.At the same time,the eidos is sportive,changing,inherently contradictory,and full of connection with each other.
作者
陈士聪
CHEN Shi-cong(Faculty of Marxism,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)
出处
《东北师大学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第2期54-61,共8页
Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金青年项目(17CZJ004)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(18QT006)。
