摘要
目的汉化父母疾病进展恐惧量表,并在癌症患儿父母中检验其信效度。方法通过翻译、回译、文化调适和预试验形成中文版父母疾病进展恐惧量表,对广州市3所三甲医院癌症患儿父母329人进行问卷调查,以检验中文版量表的信效度。结果中文版父母疾病进展恐惧量表包括情感反应、家庭生活和学校3个维度共12个条目。量表水平的内容效度指数为0.986,条目水平的内容效度指数为0.833~1.000;3个公因子累积方差贡献率为66.965%;验证性因子分析显示χ^(2)=116.325,χ^(2)/df=2.281,RMSEA=0.075,SRMR=0.044,GFI=0.919,TLI=0.934,CFI=0.949,IFI=0.950;总量表Cronbach′sα系数为0.893,折半信度为0.894,重测信度为0.819。结论中文版父母疾病进展恐惧量表具有良好的信效度,可作为我国癌症患儿父母疾病进展恐惧心理的测评工具。
Objective To translate the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-parent version(FoP-Q-SF/PR) from English to Chinese, and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese scale in parents of children with cancer. Methods A Chinese version of FoP-Q-SF/PR was formed through translation, back-translation, cross-cultural adaptation and pilot test, then it was used to investigate 329 parents of children with cancer from 3 tertiary hospitals in Guangzhou to test its reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of FoP-Q-SF/PR was consisted of 3 dimensions(affective reactions, family and life, and school) and 12 items. Its scale-level content validity index was 0.986, the item-level content validity indexes were 0.833-1.000, and the cumulative variance contribution rate of the 3 common factors was 66.965%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that: χ^(2)=116.325, χ^(2)/df=2.281, RMSEA=0.075, SRMR=0.044, GFI=0.919, TLI=0.934, CFI=0.949, IFI=0.950. The Cronbach′s α coefficient of the Chinese version scale was 0.893, its split-half reliability was 0.894, and the test-retest reliability was 0.819. Conclusion The Chinese version of FoP-Q-SF/PR has good reliability and validity, and it can be used for assessing parental fear of progression in pediatric oncology.
作者
杨祎玲
梁丽婵
孟江南
廖小妹
蔡瑞卿
叶红雨
张雨微
何小凤
史蕾
Yang Yi-ling;Liang Lichan;Meng Jiangnan;Liao Xiaomei;Cai Ruiqing;Ye Hongyu;Zhang Yuwei;He Xiaofeng;Shi Lei(School of Nursing,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China)
出处
《护理学杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第1期68-71,共4页
Journal of Nursing Science
关键词
癌症
儿童
父母
疾病进展恐惧量表
评估工具
心理测评
信度
效度
cancer
children
parents
Fear of Progression Questionnaire
assessment tool
psychometric testing
reliability
validity
