摘要
黑格尔的自然在何种意义上具有目的性,这似乎存有疑义。黑格尔批判了对自然的外在的、主观的解释,并表明了自然的能动性与统一性,这阐发出自然本身的内在目的。但是自然并不能充分体现对他物的自发的认识,因而并未体现出内在目的的核心即自由。自然目的性只是符合内在目的,但并非出于内在目的,黑格尔进一步展现出康德对“出于”与“符合”的区分。因此,自然目的无法体现内在目的的本质,黑格尔的自然目的只是一种弱的目的性。
It is questionable in what sense Hegel's nature is purposeful.I try to clarify that Hegel opposes the external and subjective understanding of nature.He tries to show the initiative and unity of nature,which expounds that nature itself has an inner purpose.However,natural purpose does not inlvole spontaneous knowledge of the other,so does not reflect that the core of the purpose is freedom.Therefore,natural purpose is only in line with the inner purpose,but not for the internal purpose.Hegel further shows Kant's distinction between"out of"and"in accordance".Hence,natural purpose cannot reflect the nature of the inner purpose,Hegel's natural purpose is only a weak purpose.
出处
《理论与现代化》
2022年第1期94-104,共11页
Theory and Modernization
基金
天津市科研创新项目“黑格尔因果理论研究”,项目编号:2020YJSB182。