期刊文献+

新型支付方式下的盗骗界分及其展开 被引量:5

Differentiation between the Crime of Fraud and the Crime of Theft under New Payment Methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 由"前置法定性与刑事法定量相统一"的犯罪认定机制决定,处分行为既是新型支付方式下的诈骗罪成立不可或缺的客观构成要件要素,亦是区分盗窃罪与诈骗罪的关键所在,只是在具体把握上,应当对处分行为进行规范性判断。而只要立足诈骗罪规制的目的在于通过对财产交易过程中人与人之间信任关系的保护,进而实现对财产权保护的法益保护立场,就必须赞同"处分意识必要说"的主流观点。同时也应承认,无论是传统型诈骗犯罪,还是新型支付方式下的诈骗犯罪,对处分意识的限定已日趋宽缓。 Depending on the crime-identifying mechanism of“Prepositioning laws determine essence,and the criminal law determines degree”,the act of disposition is not only an indispensable element of the objective constitutive requirements of the crime of fraud,but also the key point for differentiating fraud and theft.Thereafter,in terms of a concrete grasp,the act of disposition shall be adjudicated in the normative dimension under different circumstances.Basing on the standpoint of legal interest that the regulative objective of the fraud clauses in criminal law is to protect the trust relationship building among people thus realizing the protection of property rights,the mainstream standpoint of“taking the consciousness of disposition into account”shall be agreed with.However,through what has been argued,it is undeniable that,no matter for traditional fraudulent crimes or for those committed under new payment methods,the criminal limit in terms of the consciousness of disposing is becoming gradually loose.
作者 田宏杰 孙利国 TIAN Hongjie;SUN Liguo
出处 《中国法律评论》 CSSCI 2021年第6期123-137,共15页 China Law Review
基金 最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题“新型支付方式下盗窃罪与诈骗罪的界限研究”(项目批准号:GJC37)的阶段性成果。
关键词 新型支付方式 盗窃罪 诈骗罪 处分行为 处分意识 New Payment Method Crime of Theft Crime of Fraud Act of Disposition Consciousness of Disposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

二级参考文献102

共引文献445

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部