摘要
反向法人格否认是人格否认制度的应有之义,其具有弥补实定法规则缺漏、保护股东债权人、维护市场交易公平正义的重大价值,且不可替代。反向否认的立法与解释要着重衡平股东债权人、公司及其利益相关者间的利益冲突,致力于以最小成本实现最大正义。据此,无过错股东与公司债权人承担反向否认的第一道风险之后,应当赋予其向责任股东追偿的权利。我国现行公司法尚无规范可作为引入反向法人格否认的接口,宜在《公司法》第20条引入新的条款,以统一正向、横向、反向法人格否认的法律适用,实现立体、完整之法人格否认的制度构建。
Piercing the corporate veil in reverse has great value in making up for the lack of regulation in contract law,protecting shareholders and creditors,and maintaining the fairness and justice of market transactions. The legislation and interpretation of reversely denying corporate legal personality should focus on balancing the conflicts of interest among shareholders,creditors,corporations and their stakeholders,reducing social costs and striving to achieve the greatest justice at the lowest cost.Therefore,after assuming the first stage risk of reverse denial,the non-fault shareholders and the company creditors should be given the right to recover from the responsible shareholders. There is no standard in the current company law in China that can be used as an interface to introduce the reverse legal personality denial. It is appropriate to introduce a new clause in Article 20 of the Company Law to unify the legal application of the forward,horizontal and reverse legal personality denial,so as to realize the three-dimensional and complete system construction of the legal personality denial.
作者
岳万兵
Yue Wanbing(China University of Political Science and Law)
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期156-171,共16页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目“营商环境法治化的制度框架与实现研究”(20ZDA044)的阶段性成果。
关键词
法人格否认
反向法人格否认
债权人保护
双重请求权
Piercing Legal Personality in Reverse
Legal Personality Denial
Creditors Protection
Double Rights of Claim
