期刊文献+

FDI能促进创新型创业活动吗? 被引量:29

Can FDI promote innovative entrepreneurial activities?
原文传递
导出
摘要 促进创新型创业活动的开展,是提高创业成功率,提升创业质量的有效途径,应该受到政府和社会的广泛重视。本文界定了创新型创业的含义,分析了FDI对创新型创业的影响机制,并采用2011—2016年全球35个国家的面板数据,对FDI是否能够促进东道国创新型创业活动进行实证检验。结果表明:FDI与东道国创新型创业活动之间呈现倒"U型"关系,在东道国引入FDI的初始阶段,随着FDI规模的增加,FDI对创新型创业具有正向影响,超过一定阈值之后,这种影响转为负向。另外,二者之间的倒"U型"关系在发展中国家更为明显。这为通过合理制定FDI政策来促进本国创新型创业活动提供了重要思路。 As an important factor to promote economic growth, promote employment, guide the harmonious and stable development of society, and enhance the competitiveness of the country, entrepreneurship has attracted more and more attention. However, China′s total entrepreneurship activity index(TEA) has gradually declined since 2014. At the same time, China′s entrepreneurship activities are generally characterized by poor innovation, poor quality and low success rate. So, what factors can promote the innovation of new ventures, improve the quality of entrepreneurship, and enhance the success rate of entrepreneurship have become the issues that should be paid attention to in the formulation of China′s entrepreneurship policy.Although some scholars have defined entrepreneurship, but there is no literature defining innovative entrepreneurship yet. This paper holds that innovative entrepreneurship refers to the provision of advanced or unique products or services to the market through improvement or innovation on the basis of existing products or services, or through the establishment of new enterprises. Among the factors affecting entrepreneurship, FDI should not be ignored. There are abundant studies on the impact of FDI on entrepreneurship activities. Some of the studies support that FDI has positive impact on entrepreneurship, others believe that FDI has negative impact on entrepreneurship, and there are also studies believe that FDI has both positive and negative impact on the new entrants. The reason why the existing research on the linear relationship between FDI and entrepreneurship is not consistent is that the existing literature does not consider the non-linear relationship between FDI and entrepreneurship. Based on the existing literature, this paper studies the non-linear relationship between FDI and innovative entrepreneurship hoping that FDI can be reasonably introduced into China in order to enhance China′s innovation entrepreneurship, improve the quality of entrepreneurship, and put forward feasible po
作者 王佳 刘美玲 谢子远 Wang Jia;Liu Meiling;Xie Ziyuan(Business School,Zhejiang Wanli University,Ningbo 315100,Zhejiang,China;School of International Economics and International Relations,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110036,Liaoning,China)
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第11期82-89,共8页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目:“OFDI二元边际扩张对民营企业出口贸易品技术含量的影响研究”(71903181,2020.01—2022.12) 教育部人文社科青年基金:“全球价值链嵌入对中国服务业出口技术复杂度的影响机制及对策研究”(17YJC790147,2018.01—2022.12) 浙江省哲学社会科学规划重点课题:“技术寻求型OFDI提升浙江省民营企业技术创新能力的机制及对策研究”(17NDJC046Z,2017.01—2018.12) 浙江省自然科学基金:“SST视域下浙江工业企业绿色技术创新的动力机制研究”(LY19G030008,2019.01—2021.12) 浙江省教育厅一般项目:“浙江省OFDI对出口技术复杂度的影响研究”(Y201534628,2015.10—2021.12) 浙江省社科联研究课题:“GVC嵌入提升浙江省制造业出口技术复杂度的机制及对策研究”(2022N60,2021.09—2022.12)。
关键词 外商直接投资 创新型创业 倒“U型” FDI innovative entrepreneurship reverse-U-shaped relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1Barbosa N. & Vasco E. The role of inward foreign direct invegtment on cntrepreneurship [ J]. rnternational Entrepreneurship and Man- agement Journal, 2009, 5(3): 319-339. 被引量:1
  • 2Grg H. & Greenaway D. Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? [J]. The World Bank Research Observer, 2004, 19(2): 171 -197. 被引量:1
  • 3Greenaway D. & Kneller R. Exporting and productivity in the united kingdom [ J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2004, 20(3 ) : 358 -371. 被引量:1
  • 4Ruane F. & Sutherland J. Export performance and destination characteristics of irish manufacturing industry [ J]. Review of World Eco- nomics, 2005, 141(3): 442-459. 被引量:1
  • 5Ruane F. & Sutherland J. Foreign direct investment and export spillovers: How do export platforms fare? [ Z]. IIIS Discussion Paper, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 6] Bosma N. S. & Jonathan L. eds. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2009 Executive Report [ R]. Babson College, Universidad del De- sarrollo, Reykjavik University and London Business School, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 7Acs Z. J. & Amor6s J. E. Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America [J]. Small Business Economics, 2008, 31(3): 305 -322. 被引量:1
  • 8Nagel A. Beyond Knut Holt's Fusion Model, balancing market pull and technology push [ J]. International Journal of Technology Man- agement, 2003, 25(6/7): 605-622. 被引量:1
  • 9蒋殿春,张宇.经济转型与外商直接投资技术溢出效应[J].经济研究,2008,43(7):26-38. 被引量:336
  • 10刘巳洋,路江涌,陶志刚.外商直接投资对内资制造业企业的溢出效应:基于地理距离的研究[J].经济学(季刊),2008,7(4):115-128. 被引量:30

共引文献94

同被引文献662

引证文献29

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部