期刊文献+

职业足球无正当理由终止合同赔偿的CAS法理 被引量:2

CAS Jurisprudence on Compensation for Termination of Contract without Just Cause in Professional Football
下载PDF
导出
摘要 无正当理由终止合同赔偿是职业足球的常见问题。通过解决此类争议,国际体育仲裁院(CAS)形成了无正当理由终止合同赔偿的独特法理。采用案例分析法、比较研究法和归纳法,对职业足球无正当理由终止合同赔偿的CAS法理进行研究。研究认为,CAS首先适用特殊条款和不可抗力原则,然后适用“积极利益”原则并根据客观标准计算赔偿,通过遵循基于公平、诚信的“有约必守”原则和适用“积极利益”原则的威慑作用,以维持职业足球的合同稳定。通过对涉中国俱乐部的典型判例进行分析,提出适用中国法律在理论上是可行的,但实际上适用中国法律冲突导致适用国际足球规则成为一种共识;对于CAS仲裁可能的中国当事方,不能忽略公平和诚信原则,应遵守国际足球规则、CAS法理和中国法律的基本原则。 Compensation for termination of contract without just cause is a common issue in professional football.By resolving such disputes,the court of arbitration for sport(CAS)has formed a unique jurisprudence for termination of contracts without just cause.Adopting case analysis,comparison and induction,this paper studied the CAS jurisprudence of compensation for professional football termination of contract without just cause,and found that for the compensation for professional football termination of contract without just cause,CAS first applied the special terms and the principle of force majeure,then applied the principle of“positive interest”and calculated the compensation according to objective standards.Through deterrence effect by applying the principle of“positive interests”and following the principle of“pacta sunt servanda”based on fairness and good faith,CAS maintained the contract stability of professional football.By analyzing the typical cases involving the Chinese clubs,this paper put forward that it was feasible to apply the Chinese law to the compensation for professional football breach of contract in theory,but the actual professional football contract conflicted with the applicable Chinese law,resulting in the application of the international football rules becoming a common consensus.At present,the domestic football rules lagged behind the development of the international football rules.Therefore,relevant rules should be revised in time to keep up with the development process of the international rules.For the possible Chinese parties to CAS arbitration,the principles of fairness and good faith should not be ignored.They should abide by the international football rules,CAS jurisprudence and the basic principles of Chinese law and sign contracts in a standardized manner.
作者 向会英 张林 XIANG Huiying;ZHANG Lin(School of Economic and Management, Shanghai Sport Univ., Shanghai 200438, China;Sports Law Inst., Shanghai Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201701, China)
出处 《武汉体育学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第12期48-55,共8页 Journal of Wuhan Sports University
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BTY058)。
关键词 职业足球 无正当理由 终止合同 赔偿 国际体育仲裁院 法理 professional football without just cause termi-nation of contract compensation CAS jurisprudence
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献24

  • 1郑昱.英美法违约损害赔偿规则及其在涉外商务中的应用[J].中山大学学报论丛,2005,25(2):105-111. 被引量:2
  • 2中国足协章程(2005)[EB/OL].http://www.fa.org.cn/bulletin/zcfg/2013-08-08/416604.html. 被引量:1
  • 3中国足球协会仲裁委员会工作规则(2009)[EB/OL].http://www.fa.org.cn/bulletin/zcfg/2013-08-08/416607.html. 被引量:1
  • 4FIFA Rules Governing the Procedures of the Players' Stafus Committee and the Dispute Resolution Chamber (2014)[EB/OL].http://www.fifa. com/mm/document/affederation/administration/01/95/84/00/verfahrens- ordnung. 被引量:1
  • 5FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (2012)[EB/OL]. http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affederation/administration/01/95/83/ 85//regulati -e.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 6CAS code (2013)[EB/OL].http://www.tas-cas.org/d2wfiles/document/ 4962/5048/0/Code20201320corrections 20finales20(en).pdf. 被引量:1
  • 7FIFA FAQs[EB/OL].http ://www.fifa.c'om/mm/document/affederation/foot- ballgovernance/O 1/70/80/O0//faq_disputes_solidarity_contribution_en. 被引量:1
  • 8LOUISE R. Introduction to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) & the Role of National Courts in International Sports Disputes, An Sym- posium[J].Joumal of Dispute Resolution, 2012 ( 1 ) : 63-81. 被引量:1
  • 9EBERHARD F, GERD M. Transfer fee regulations in Enropean football [J].European Economic Review, 2003,47 ( 3 ) : 645-668. 被引量:1
  • 10PAUL A C. FIFA Transfer Rules and Unilateral Termination Without"Just Cause" [J].Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law, 2013(2) : 1. 被引量:1

共引文献5

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部