摘要
古籍校勘的通常做法是选用精善的版本作为权威底本进行对校,不足之处再辅以本校、他校和理校,是为"校勘四法"。但传世古籍里,即便是明清人的著作,权威底本失存的情形也不在少数。而存世各种版本在传抄和刊印的过程中又不可避免地相互影响,纵使经由谱系法梳理,其谱牒归属仍无法追溯,有相当多的异文难以用现行的方法定夺。在这种状况下,能否为不同版本的异文取舍提供相对客观的判断依据?本文以钱谦益《投笔集》为个案,借助统计学概念,提出一种概率择优的异文校勘法——量校法,并对其可行性进行了试验。
The"Four Rules of Textual Criticism",Dui Jiao,Ben Jiao,Ta Jiao,and Li Jiao have been used for emendating ancient works of either printed books or manuscripts.Dui Jiao is to identify the authoritative edition and copy for collating the variants;Ben Jiao is to emendate within the book and manuscript itself,or related subjects in other books and manuscripts,known as Ta Jiao;Li Jiao is to exercise scholarship of critical and logical analysis when the other three methods are not applicable.However,an authoritative edition often does not exist even for the works of the Ming and Qing Dynasties.Furthermore,during the transmission of texts,variants in intermediate copies were inevitably mixed together,such that the Stemmatics method cannot rebuild the family tree.As a result,corrupted texts cannot be restored by the"Four Rules of Textual Criticism".To address such problem,this paper proposes a new method based on statistical analysis with application to Tou Bi Ji as a case study.The new method is referred as Statistical Textual Criticism by the authors.
作者
杨柳
杨崇和
Yang Liu;Howard C.Yang(China Academy of Art;Montage Technology Group Limited)
出处
《图书馆杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第11期133-147,共15页
Library Journal
关键词
校勘学
谱系法
量校法
投笔集
帕雷托图
钱谦益
Textual criticism
Stemmatics
Statistical textual criticism
Tou Bi Ji
Pareto Chart
Qian Qianyi
