摘要
中国现有的人文社会科学学术期刊评价体系以定量评价为主导,尽管有一定的合理之处,但在实际评价中"以刊评文"、学术创新力不足、重量轻质等问题日益凸显。在当前学术评价倡导"破五唯",建设高品质学术期刊,展现中国特色的背景下,人文社会科学学术期刊质量评价体系的构建需要遵循人文社会科学学术期刊的特点,避免过度量化,进行真正深入学术期刊内容,强调学术创新、学术声誉、特色风格、功能影响等定性指标。在构建评价体系的基础上,选取20种中国文学学术期刊进行实证研究表明,运用该评价体系可以反映以引文指标为重要比例的文献计量学指标难以反映的特征,能够取得较好的评价结果。
The existing evaluation system of academic journals of humanities and social sciences in China is mainly based on quantitative indexes, and to some extent it is reasonable, but problems such as evaluating papers by journals, lack of academic innovation, stressing quantity over quality are prominent. Under the background of the current academic evaluation advocating “breaking with the five-only”, building high-quality academic journals, and showing Chinese characteristics, construction of quality evaluation system of academic journals of humanity and social sciences needs to follow their characteristics, avoid excessive reliance on quantitative indexes and adopt quality evaluation which truly goes deep into the content of academic journals and pays attention to qualitative indexes such as academic innovation, academic reputation, characteristics and styles, and function realization. Based on the built evaluation system, 20 literature journals are selected as samples to test the effects of the evaluation system. The results show that the evaluation system can reflect characteristics of journals what quantitative indexes can’t reflect, and it can achieve better evaluation results.
作者
吴林娟
WU Linjuan(School of Government,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,P.R.China;Editorial Board of Journal of Nanjing Institute of Technology,Nanjing 211167,P.R.China)
出处
《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期97-110,共14页
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
人文社会科学
学术期刊
期刊评价
评价体系
文学期刊
humanities and social sciences
academic journals
journal evaluation
evaluation system
literature journals
