摘要
目的:比较AD缝合法和皮肤缝合器缝合法在外侧延长"L"形切口治疗跟骨骨折术中效果。方法:选择2015年4月-2020年4月本院的80例跟骨骨折的手术患者。所有患者入院后,按随机数字表法分为A组(n=39)和B组(n=41)。A组采用AD缝合法,B组采用皮肤缝合器缝合法。比较两组手术时间、皮肤切口缝合时间及术后切口并发症发生情况。结果:两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组皮肤切口缝合时间短于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后切口并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在跟骨骨折皮肤切口的缝合中,皮肤缝合器缝合法与AD缝合法相比,伤口愈合效果相当,但前者缝合速度更快,操作更加简便易行。
Objective:To compare the treatment effect of Allgower-Donati(AD)suture and skin stapler suture in calcaneal fracture surgery with lateral extensive"L"shaped incision.Method:A total of 80 patients with calcaneal fractures underwent surgery in our hospital were selected from April 2015 to April 2020.After admission,all patients were divided into group A(n=39)and group B(n=41)according to random number table method.AD suture was used in group A and skin stapler suture was used in group B.The surgery time,skin incision suture time and postoperative incision complications were compared between the two groups.Result:There was no significant difference in surgery time between the two groups(P>0.05).The skin incision suture time in group B was shorter than that in group A,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative incision complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:In the suturing of skin incision of calcaneal fracture,compared with AD suture,the skin stapler suture has the same wound healing effect,but the former has faster suturing speed and easier operation.
作者
林晓毅
林凤晖
冯进益
刘复安
LIN Xiaoyi;LIN Fenghui;FENG Jinyi;LIU Fu’an(First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University,Xiamen 361003,China;不详)
出处
《中国医学创新》
CAS
2021年第33期49-52,共4页
Medical Innovation of China
