摘要
《春秋繁露》是研究董仲舒思想的重要材料,更是研究汉代思想的重要文献,但《春秋繁露》历来存在着文献辨伪问题。考证《春秋繁露》真伪的学者大致可分为“推论派”“唯理派”和“文献互见派”,他们各自提出了一些真知灼见(good idea),但都缺乏确切证据。“考据之学”和研究董仲舒哲学思想的“义理之学”属于不同的学术分野,应有各自的独立性。
Luxuriant Gems of The Spring and Autumn Annals is an important material for the study of Dong Zhongshu’s thoughts,and it is also an important literature for the study of the thoughts in the Han Dynasty.However,there has always had the problem of verifying the authenticity of the articles in it.Scholars who have verified the authenticity of them can be roughly divided into“school of inference”,“school of rationalism”and“school of literature cross reference”.They all have proposed some good ideas,but they lack conclusive evidences.“Textual research”and“content research”about the study of Dong Zhongshu’s philosophical thoughts belong to different academic fields and they should have their own independence.
作者
邓红
DENG Hong(Department of Literature,Kitakyushu University,Kitakyushu,Fukuoka Ken 802-0841,Japan)
出处
《衡水学院学报》
2021年第6期21-30,102,共11页
Journal of Hengshui University
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目《董仲舒传世文献考辨与历代注疏研究》(19ZDA027)。
关键词
董仲舒
《春秋繁露》
五行
阴阳
伪篇
真篇
考据之学
义理之学
Dong Zhongshu
Luxuriant Gems of The Spring and Autumn Annals
the five elements
yin and yang
false text
authentic text
textual research
content research
