期刊文献+

3~5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展 被引量:1

Cognitive Development of Colour Mapping Morality and Power Concepts in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用将道德/不道德形象图片摆放在白或黑色,将权力/无权力形象图片摆放在黄或灰色色块上的图片迫选任务来探讨3~5岁幼儿颜色隐喻的认知发展进程。通过2个实验发现:3岁幼儿尚不具备颜色隐喻理解能力;4岁幼儿初步形成白黑颜色映射道德概念的隐喻认知;5岁幼儿颜色隐喻认知能力继续增强,并形成黄灰颜色映射权力概念的隐喻认知。结果表明:3~5岁幼儿道德概念的白黑颜色隐喻和权力概念的黄灰颜色隐喻能力发展不同步,前者优于后者。源域习得时间的早晚影响幼儿隐喻理解能力的形成。 To explore the development law of colour metaphor in children aged 3 to 5 years,this study analyzed images with moral and immoral characters in white or black color and images with powerful and powerless characters in yellow or grey colour.By conducting two experiments,the current research obtained the following results:1)3-year-old children had yet to develop colour metaphors;2)4-year-old children initially formed metaphorical cognition of white and black colour mapping moral concept;3)5-year-old children’s cognitive ability of colour metaphor continued to improve,forming the metaphorical cognition of yellow and grey colour mapping power concept.Comprehensive analysis indicated inconsistency in the development of children’s ability to understand the colour metaphors.Moreover,the development of moral colour metaphor was better than that of power colour metaphor.The results suggest that the time of source domain acquisition affects the formation of children’s metaphorical comprehension ability.
作者 贺晓玲 刘奕晴 那琳娜 HE Xiaoling;LIU Yiqing;NA Linna(School of Public Administration,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期636-641,共6页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 国家社科基金一般项目(21BGL202) 江西省教育科学“十四五”规划课题(21BY005) 江西省高等学校教学改革研究课题(JXJG-19-1-13)。
关键词 幼儿 道德概念 权力概念 颜色隐喻 children morality power colour metaphor
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献49

  • 1郑祖华.论中国封建社会政治名份与土地占有的共振和谐[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1989,39(2):94-102. 被引量:4
  • 2Banerjee, P., Chatterjee, E, & Sinha, J. (2012). Is it light ordark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23(4), 407-409. 被引量:1
  • 3Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual of symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-609. 被引量:1
  • 4Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. 被引量:1
  • 5Duguid, M. M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). Living large: The powerful overestimate their own height. Psychological Science, 23(1), 36-40. 被引量:1
  • 6Gabay, S., Leibovich, T., Henik, A., & Gronau, N. (2013). Size before numbers: Conceptual size primes numerical value. Cognition, 129(1), 18-23. 被引量:1
  • 7Giessner, S. R., & Schubert, T. W. (2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders' power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1), 30-44. 被引量:1
  • 8Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28(1), 1-26. 被引量:1
  • 9Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480. 被引量:1
  • 10Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216. 被引量:1

共引文献81

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部