摘要
《联合国海洋法公约》附件七仲裁庭不能够滥用所谓的“审查必要性”对于该公约明确规定外的事项行使管辖权。“审查”与“管辖”二者的意涵存在区别,“审查”的必要性并不等于“管辖”的必要性。《联合国海洋法公约》附件七仲裁庭对于某事项的管辖权应当严格地源自该公约对于该事项的明确规定,而非基于该事项与该公约规定事项之间的间接联系。否则,《联合国海洋法公约》附件七仲裁庭的管辖权将会被无限扩张至法定范围之外,导致国际法的秩序和发展受到威胁。
As for the matters beyond those expressly stipulated in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS),Arbitral Tribunals constituted under Annex Ⅶ to the UNCLOS cannot totally base their jurisdiction over such matters on the so-called“Necessity”of reviewing them.The meanings and implications between“review”and“exercise jurisdiction”are various,and the necessity of“review”does not equally mean the necessity of“exercise jurisdiction”.The matters over which the Arbitral Tribunals Constituted under Annex Ⅶ to the UNCLOS can exercise jurisdiction should strictly be the matters which are expressly provided for in the UNCLOS,rather than those which just have indirect links with such matters expressly stipulated in the UNCLOS.Otherwise,the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunals constituted under Annex Ⅶ to the UNCLOS will infinitely extend beyond the legal scope,resulting in threats to the order and development of international law.
作者
赵鹏
ZHAO Peng(China University of Political Science and Law)
出处
《边界与海洋研究》
2021年第5期95-108,共14页
Journal of Boundary and Ocean Studies
关键词
《联合国海洋法公约》附件七仲裁庭
管辖的必要性
必要性审查
管辖权扩张
Arbitral Tribunals constituted under AnnexⅦto the UNCLOS
“necessity”of exercising jurisdiction
review of“necessity”
expansion of jurisdiction
