期刊文献+

经典的共生与殊途——论金谷宴集与兰亭雅集的经典化过程与接受差异 被引量:1

Symbiosis and Different Paths of Classics:On Classicization Process and Reception Differences of Jingu Banquet and Lanting Collectionss
下载PDF
导出
摘要 兰亭雅集与金谷宴集都是文人雅集史上的经典事件,然而这两次雅集真正被视为经典却始于唐代高宗、武后朝。这很大程度上与王羲之的书法尤其是《兰亭集序》在唐代受到人们的尊崇有关,即兰亭雅集因《兰亭集序》的书法而得以彰显。王羲之与石崇的思想有类似处,《兰亭集序》与《金谷诗叙》的结构、表达的情感、两次集会的规则亦多相似,可证王羲之对时人将《兰亭集序》比拟《金谷诗叙》而喜并非虚言。然而,兰亭雅集在后世的影响却远远大于金谷宴集。如此反差,与中国古代文人的审美观念、王羲之与石崇二人的品性区别、两篇作品的文本影响力与书法价值的差异、两次集会的缘由所具有的可能性以及金谷园故事多而不易聚焦等多方面的因素有关。 The Lanting Collections and the Jingu Banquet are both classical events in the history of the literati collections.However,these two collections were really regarded as classics only in periods of Emperor Gaozong and Empress Wu in Tang Dynasty.To a large extent,this is related to the fact that Wang Xizhi’s calligraphy,particularly his“Preface of Orchid Pavilion Collection”was revered by people especially by Emperor Taizong in Tang Dynasty.In other words,the Lanting Collections was highlighted mainly because of the calligraphy of the“Preface of Orchid Pavilion Collection”.With similar thoughts,Wang Xizhi and Shi Chong,the“Preface of Orchid Pavilion Collection”and the“Jinggu Poems”have similar structures and emotion expression.The influence of the former is much greater than the latter in the later generations,and the causes can be various.
作者 顾友泽 袁昕澄 Gu Youze;Yuan Xincheng
出处 《江海学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期212-221,255,共11页 Jianghai Academic Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1刘跃进著..门阀士族与文学总集[M].西安:世界图书西安出版公司,2014:619.
  • 2(宋)赵与时著..宾退录[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983:163.
  • 3徐明霞..卢照邻集杨炯集[M].北京:中华书局,1980:341.
  • 4(唐)张说著,熊飞校注..张说集校注 第4册[M].北京:中华书局,2013:1741.
  • 5白居易撰,顾学颉校点..白居易集3[M].北京:中华书局,1979:786-1196.
  • 6(宋)欧阳修,宋祁撰..新唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975:6472.
  • 7王群栗校注..宣和书谱[M].杭州:浙江人民美术出版社,2012:213.
  • 8马宗霍编..书林藻鉴 书林记事[M].北京:文物出版社,1984:345.
  • 9曾枣庄,刘琳主编..全宋文 第133册[M].上海:上海辞书出版社;合肥,2006:375.
  • 10(东汉)应劭撰,王利器校注..风俗通义校注[M].北京:中华书局,1981:652.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部