摘要
从支持对象、使用额度、运营机构、使用范围、兑现形式等5个维度分析与比较了湖南、武汉、山东、杭州经开区、安徽马鞍山、北京、南京江北新区等7个地区创新券政策的特点,并将现有创新券政策分为实体机构管理与平台管理两种运行模式。基于国家知识产权局发布的工业企业专利数据库整理而成的各省市自治区专利数量与质量交互项模型估计,评估了创新券政策效果:①创新券政策主要通过权力让渡显著提升了各地区企业的专利数量能力,但引发了企业动机偏误和专利质量能力抑制问题;②创新券政策通过“专用代币→降低技术外包成本→缓解内部R&D资源挤占→提高自主创新能力”的路径提高了企业R&D资源投入的专利产出能力,但引发了企业创新能力分化的“马太效应”;③在通用通兑和互认互通机制实施过程中,企业专利数量能力在不同地区之间的差异不断缩小,但专利质量能力方面未发生明显变化。建议从加强需求层面调查以拓宽服务范围、明晰服务方技术人员收益方案、探索跨区域通汇通兑机制,建立健全创新券政策评价体系等角度进一步对政策进行改进。
This paper utilises five dimensions such as:the object of support,the quota of use,the organization of operation,the scope of use,and the form of realization,to analyse and compare the characteristics of Innovation Voucher Policies in seven regions,such as Hunan,Wuhan,Shandong,Hangzhou Jingkai district,Anhui Maanshan,Beiing,Nanjing Jiangbei New District,the pa per also divides the existing innovation voucher policy into two modes of operation:entity management and platform management of Based on the estimation of the interaction item model,collected from the industrial enterprise patent database published by the State Intellectual Property Of-fice,between quantity and quality of patents in various provinces,municipalities and autonomous regions,,the effect of the Innovation Voucher policy is evaluated as follows:①Through the transfer of power,the Innovation Voucher policy significantly improves the patent quantity capability of enterprises in different regions,but it leads to enterprise motivation bias and the inhibition of patent quality capability.②The Innovation Voucher poliey improves the patent output ability of enterprises'R&D resource input through the route of"special currency→reduction of technology outsourcing cost→alleviation of internal R&D Resource crowding-out effect→improvement of inde-pendent innovation ability",however,it leads to the"Matthew Effect"of the differentiation of enterprises'innova-tion ability.③In the process of implementing the universal exchange and mutual recognition and exchange mecha-nism,the differences of enterprises'patent quantity capacity between different regions have been narrowing,but the patent quality capability has no significant change.It is recommended to further improve the policy from the follow-ing perspectives:enlarging the services scope by strengthening the demand-level investigations,clarifying the income plan of service technicians,exploring the cross-regional currency exchange mechanism,as well as establishing the innovation voucher policy evalu
作者
付书科
马卓
张立璟
FU Shu-ke;MA Zhuo;ZHANG Li-Jing(School of Law and Business,Wuhan Institute of Technology,Hubei Wuhan 430205,China;School of Economics and Management,Wuhan University,Hubei Wuhan 430072,China;School of Engineering,The University of Melbourne,Melbourne VIC3010,Australia)
出处
《科学管理研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期22-29,共8页
Scientific Management Research
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(18YJCZH029)
湖北省社会科学基金项目(2019055)
湖北省技术创新专项(软科学类)(2019ADC133)。
关键词
科技创新券
分析与比较
运行模式
政策效果
Sci-tech innovation voucher
Analysis and comparison
Operation mode
Policy effect
