摘要
历经多次审议,《刑法修正案(十一)》始终坚持为高空抛物行为设置独立罪名入刑,然而从危害公共安全类犯罪到扰乱公共秩序类犯罪的性质转变并不能改变高空抛物本身不具有独立入罪的法理依据与现实必要性这一事实。将高空抛物独立入罪造成了刑法罪名体系的分散与不协调,也暴露了我国现行刑事立法的情绪化立法与现象立法趋向,容易造成国家刑罚权的扩张。对于高空抛物的刑法规制,应根据高空抛物的行为类型,分别依照危害公共安全类犯罪、危害公民人身、财产安全类犯罪定罪量刑。
After much deliberation,Criminal Law Amendment 11 insisted on setting up separate charge for the high-altitude parabolic,however,the transformation from the crime of endangering pubilc safety to the crime of disrupting public order cannot change the fact that it does not have the legal principle and necessity as an independent charge.The crime has achieved the division and inconsistency of the criminal jurisprudence system,and also exposed our legislation tendency like being emotional and phenomenonization,which is easy to cause penalty expansion.To deal with the high-altitude parabolic problem,the criminal law should convict them as the pubilc safety crime,the personal safety crime or the property security by dividing the behavior into different types.
作者
陈琦琦
CHEN Qiqi(College of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430000,China)
出处
《湖南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第3期95-102,共8页
Journal of Hunan Institute of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
关键词
高空抛物
情绪性立法
现象立法
以危险方法危害公共安全
扰乱公共秩序
high-altitude parabolic
emotional legislation
phenonmenon legislation
endanger public safety in dangerous ways
disturb public order
