摘要
《民法典》1234条规定了生态修复责任,这为生态修复工作的展开提供了明确的指引,也为生态环境损害救济提供了强有力的法律依据。生态修复责任是生态环境损害救济的一种新的责任承担方式。本文通过对生态修复责任司法实践现状加以梳理,发现在司法实践中仍存在不少问题。例如:生态修复责任法律性质表达不明确、生态修复责任配套机制不完善、生态修复验收制度不健全等。因此,需要明确生态修复责任的法律性质、完善生态修复责任配套机制、健全验收制度等措施来保障生态修复责任司法实践的实现。
Article 1234 of the Civil Code stipulates that the responsibility of ecological environment restoration provides clear guidance for the development of ecological restoration work,and provides a strong legal basis for the relief of ecological environment damage.Ecological restoration responsibility is a new way to take responsibility for the relief of ecological environment damage.This paper,through the current situation and combing the judicial practice of ecological restoration responsibility,finds that there are still many problems in judicial practice.For example:the nature of ecological restoration responsibility is unclear,the supporting mechanism of ecological restoration responsibility is not perfect,and the ecological restoration acceptance system is not perfect.Therefore,we need to clarify the legal nature of ecological restoration responsibility,improve the supporting mechanism of ecological restoration responsibility,and improve the acceptance system to ensure the realization of the judicial practice of ecological restoration responsibility.
作者
卢娜娜
宁清同
LU Na-na;NING Qing-tong(School of Law,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,China)
出处
《治理现代化研究》
2021年第5期90-96,共7页
Governance Modernization Studies
基金
2017年度国家社会科学基金项目“法律责任生态化语境下生态修复责任研究”(项目批准号:17BFX126)的阶段性成果。
关键词
生态修复责任
法律性质
修复评估
验收制度
ecological restoration responsibility
legal nature
restoration evaluation
acceptance system
