期刊文献+

司法与意识形态关系的分析模式之演变 被引量:3

The Evolution of Analysis Models of the Relationship between Judiciary and Ideology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 司法与意识形态的关系是实践上客观存在、理论上需认真对待的时代课题,而分析模式问题则是系统研究司法与意识形态的关系课题的逻辑起点。国外学界以法的理想类型及其所蕴含的法政关系理想类型为基础,明确提出了嵌入、自治、回应等宏观分析框架,以及法律、态度、策略和历史制度主义等微观分析模型。随着理论与方法上的不断进展,这些分析模式之间在经历了争执、批判和反思之后逐步呈现出一种调和和平衡的演变态势,司法系统与意识形态体系关系的均衡论、司法决策中法律因素与意识形态因素关系的调和论日趋居于主导地位。每一种分析模式都是对特定时代背景下法律现象及其与外部世界的实践关系的理论表达,而诸种分析模式之间的演变趋势则植根于整体的社会变迁历程和法治发展进程。受政治化与专业化两种现实力量的直接影响,当代法律系统的局部自治与有限受制状态决定了自治与沟通兼备的交叉型分析日益成为司法与意识形态关系研究更为妥当的模式。 The relationship between judiciary and ideology is a subject of the times that exists objectively in practice and needs to be taken seriously in theory,and the problem of analysis model is the logical starting for systematic study.Based on the ideal types of law and the ideal types of law-politics relationship,foreign scholars clearly put forward macro analysis frameworks such as embeddedness,autonomy and response,and micro analysis models such as law,attitude,strategy and historical institutionalism.With the continuous progress of relevant research in theory and method,these analysis models gradually show a trend of harmony and balance after dispute,criticism and reflection.The balanced theory between judicial system and ideological system,and the harmonious theory between legal factors and ideological factors in judicial decision-making are increasingly dominant.Each analysis model is a theoretical expression of the legal phenomenon and its practical relationship with the outside world under the specific background of the times,while the evolution trend of those analysis models is rooted in the overall process of social change and the development of the rule of law.Under the direct influence of two practical forces of politicization and specialization,the partial autonomy and limited restriction of the contemporary legal system determines that the intersecting analysis with both autonomy and communication is becoming the more appropriate model for the study of the relationship between judiciary and ideology.
作者 张昌辉 ZHANG Changhui(School of Law,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241003,China)
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第5期179-188,共10页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目“司法与意识形态的关系研究:理论模式与实践形态”(AHSKQ2016D07)。
关键词 司法 意识形态 司法政治 交互型分析模式 judiciary ideology judicial politics interactive analysis model
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1克里斯汀·希普诺维奇,张昌辉,施长征.法律与意识形态[J].南京大学法律评论,2012(1):14-22. 被引量:7
  • 2安德鲁·哈尔平,张昌辉(译).意识形态与法律[J].法律与伦理,2019,0(2):105-121. 被引量:1
  • 3P.,S.,阿蒂亚(P.,S.,Atiyah),R.,S.,萨默斯(Robert,S.,Summers)著,金敏,陈林林,王笑红译..英美法中的形式与实质 法律推理、法律理论和法律制度的比较研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005:380.
  • 4P.诺内特,P.塞尔兹尼克著,季卫东,张志铭译..转变中的法律与社会 迈向回应型法[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:143.
  • 5(美)杰弗瑞·A.,西格尔,(美)哈罗德·J.,斯皮斯刘哲玮..正义背后的意识形态最高法院与态度模型[M],2012:434页.
  • 6(美)菲尔德曼著,李国庆译..从前现代主义到后现代主义的美国法律思想[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005:385.
  • 7(美)波斯纳(Richard,A.Posner)著,苏,力译..法理学问题[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:625.
  • 8邓矜婷.新法律现实主义的最新发展与启示[J].法学家,2014(4):1-18. 被引量:14
  • 9(美)R.M.昂格尔(Roberto,Mangabeira,Unger)著,吴玉章,周汉华译..现代社会中的法律[M].南京:译林出版社,2001:295.
  • 10(美)达玛什卡著..雅理译丛 司法和国家权力的多种面孔 比较视野中的法律程序[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2015:360.

共引文献566

同被引文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部