摘要
资本主义起源是马克思“历史科学”研究的重点问题之一。内含双重逻辑:一是抽象性的科学解释与总和性的历史学解释的双重模式逻辑,二是生产力起基础性作用的结构性动力和从感性活动出发的主体性动力的双重动力逻辑。晚年马克思在人类学和世界历史领域进行了弥合性建构。恩格斯继承并提出“历史合力论”,强调“双重动力”是“归根结底”“相互作用论”双向意义上决定不同社会形态的更替。在“主体性”的“空场”与“在场”问题上,卢卡奇与第二国际展开了批判性对话。在当代进行这一研究的有效性可以纠偏马克思主义理论在传播分化时出现的曲解,更重要的是彰显历史唯物主义在现实问题上的“在场”。
The origin of capitalism is one of the key issues in Marx’s "historical science" research. It contains dual Logic: one is the dual mode logic of abstract scientific interpretation and summative historical interpretation.The second is the dual dynamic logic of the structural motive force of productive forces and the subjective motive force of perceptual activities. In his later years, Marx made a bridging construction in the field of Anthropology and world history. Engels put forward the theory of "double impetus" and"mutual impetus" in the final analysis. On the issue of "empty field"and "presence" of "subjectivity", Lukacs launched a critical dialogue with the second international. In addition to correcting the misinterpretation of Marxist theory in the process of communication differentiation, it is more important to highlight the "presence" of historical materialism in practical issues.
出处
《理论界》
2021年第7期49-56,共8页
Theory Horizon
关键词
资本主义起源
主体性
总体性
历史唯物主义
the origin of capitalism
subjectivity
totality
historical materialism
