期刊文献+

知识如何走出象牙塔——基于学术研究与政策实践关系的视角 被引量:4

How is Knowledge Beyond the Ivory Tower——From the Perspective of the Relationship between Academic Research and Policy Practice
原文传递
导出
摘要 在政府决策科学化的治理诉求下,越来越多的学者作为顾问参与到政府的政策活动中,但理论研究者与政策实践者知识建构方式的不同造成了学术研究和政策实践的鸿沟,学界与政界的制度差异进一步强化了两个领域的隔阂。当代中国学者在资政实践中具备旁观者与行动者的双重身份,理论功底和实践能力是其成为行动者的前提和基础。在由官员主导的政学交往过程中,学者应坚守自己的专业承诺和学术良知。学术自主性的确立和学术制度的建构是知识得到认可、学者获得尊重的前提;同时,知识的理论传统只有与实践传统相结合,形成既有概念和理论支撑,又有清晰的问题源流和充分经验证据支持的研究进路,学术研究才能有效地指导政策实践。 Under the demand for scientific decision-making,more and more scholars have participated in government policy activities.However,the difference in knowledge construction methods between scholars and officials has created a gap between academic research and policy practice;and the institutional differences between academia and politics have strengthened the gap between the two realms.At present,Chinese scholars have the dual i-dentities of bystanders and actors in the practice of government administration.The theoretical foundation and practical ability are the prerequisites for them to become actors.In the process of political and academic communication led by officials,scholars should stick to their professional commitments and academic conscience.The establishment of academic autonomy and the construction of academic systems are the prerequisites for scholars to gain respect.The theoretical tradition of knowledge must be combined with the practice tradition,so that academic research can effectively guide policy practice.
作者 刘皛 LIU Xiao(Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期47-53,共7页 Journal of Higher Education
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划项目(B1803)。
关键词 知识 学者 理论 学术研究 政策实践 knowledge scholar theory academic research policy practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献24

同被引文献82

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部