摘要
"思想单位"是有意义的思维情境,包含情境构作、情境处理与情境融合三个层面。借由"思想单位"研究方法,检视《论语·学而》第一章,指出该章涉及思想单位的问题要素包括有什么、会怎样、是什么三个型态的问题,且隐含着要怎样或应怎样的思考,但缺少了"所以然"的情境处理。通过考察何晏《论语集解》、皇侃《论语集解义疏》、邢昺《论语注疏》、朱熹《朱子集注》及简朝亮《论语集注补证述疏》等,比较各家对《论语·学而》第一章诠释中多层次"所以然"的情境处理及不同的思想单位,根据明晰性、关联性、一致性、解释性、预测性、实用性、合宜性、价值性等判断标准,对比各家诠释意义的饱沃度,进而说明经典诠释典范之特性。
A thought unit is a meaningful mental context,including three levels:context construction,context clarification,and context consolidation.This paper uses the thought unit research method to examine Xue Er,the first chapter of the Analects pointed out three types of thought unit questions:what is there?,what will happen?,and what is it?This chapter also implies reflection about what should be?but it lacks the context clarification of reasons(suo yi ran所以然).This paper compares the multilevel context clarification of reasons and thought units developed by various schools in the process of interpreting Xue Er by examining He Yan's Collected Explanations of Analects,Huang Kan's The Commentary of Collected Explanations of Analects,Xing Bing's The Commentary on Analects,Zhu Xi's Annotations in the Analects,and Jian Chaoliang's Supplementary notes of Zhu Xi's Annotations in the Analects.This article compares the degree of fertility between the interpretations of various schools based on the criteria of clarity,relevance,consistency,explanatory power,ability to predict,practicality,suitability,and value and then goes on to explain the necessary characteristics of a paradigmatic textual interpretation.
作者
李贤中
Hsien-Chung Lee(Philosophy Department,Taiwan University,Taibei 10617,China)
出处
《湖南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期17-25,共9页
Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
关键词
意义饱沃度
思想单位
情境构作
情境处理
诠释典范
degree of meaning fertility
thought unit
context construction
context clarification
interpretive paradigm
