摘要
欧阳修援引《春秋》之大义而首倡政治的正统论,本应是一个基于政治理想的哲学问题,具有其超越维度;但他基于"迹"而论正统的立场,就把作为正统的哲学问题讲成了现实的史论问题,从而失去了其超越维度。章望之对欧阳修提出批评,重提超越维度,但苏东坡起而反对,维护欧阳修的立场,进而从"实"的立场,即从"有天下"之"实"讲正统,从而完全陷入了经验论的立场,彻底丧失了《春秋》正统论之大义。本文将以欧阳修、章望之、苏东坡的正统之辩为线索,说明各自的立场,复援引历代对欧阳修、苏东坡之正统论的批评,从而引出孔子正统之说的大义,由此勾勒出政治正统理念之可能模型。
Ouyang Xiu invoked the Spring and Autumn Annals and initiated an argument on political orthodoxy,which was supposed to be a philosophical issue concerning political ideals.However,when he discussed orthodoxy in terms of"traces,"he made this philosophical issue into a pragmatic historical one,and therefore lost its transcendent dimension.After Zhang Wangzhi criticized Ouyang and brought up the transcendent dimension again,Su Dongpo opposed it,defending Ouyang Xiu’s position and discussing orthodoxy from the standpoint of"concrete reality"(that is,"possessing the world under Heaven"),completely falling into empiricism and losing the grand theme of orthodoxy in the Spring and Autumn Annals.This paper takes Ouyang Xiu,Zhang Wangzhi,and Su Dongpo’s arguments concerning orthodoxy as a clue to explain their respective positions,and,by reviewing previous criticisms of Ouyang Xiu and Su Dongpo’s theories of orthodoxy,draws on Confucius’s idea of orthodoxy and outlines possible models of political orthodoxy theory.
作者
张晚林
Zhu Yuan
Zhang WanlinZhu Yuan(Department of Philosophy at Xiangtan University;School of Foreign Languages at Renmin University of China)
出处
《孔学堂》
CSSCI
2021年第2期39-52,I0044-I0052,共23页
Confucian Academy
基金
湖南科技大学“中国传统文化与新时代意识形态建设研究中心”基地项目(本人为特邀研究员)阶段性成果。
关键词
欧阳修
章望之
苏东坡
正统
春秋公羊学
Ouyang Xiu
Zhang Wangzhi
Su Dongpo
orthodoxy
studies of the Gongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals
